fandabbidozey

by netclocker 74 Replies latest watchtower bible

• 

  LittleToe

  Netclocker:

  fandabbidozey comes from the crankies and its brittish tv, not english, and its a scottish word

  Another Crackerjack fan, I see

  On the basis of similar details to your "research" the JWs came up with the idea of 1975. The only difference is that you're stating that Adam was 30 when Eve was created, thus pointing to 2005 as the start of Jesus millenial rule. Why don't you do as they appear to be doing and state that the 120 years of Noah's proclamation means that we now have a 120 year wait until he brings the modern-day equivilent of a flood?

  Your details are based on a few a priori beliefs such as JW biblical chronology being correct, Genesis being a totally accurate record of human beginnings and early history, and a pre-millenialist viewpoint of the book of Revelation.

  All in all it doesn't add up, and both the foundations that you've built upon, as well as the ediface you've attempted to construct, are showing more than a few cracks.

  From one Scot to another (I presume) welcome to the board. Now either "chill oot, pal", or "go boil yer heid"
• 

  netclocker

  
  if you looked up the link little toe, there is a fitting scripture about god stepping in before its too late

  http://www.eye.net/eye/issue/issue_02.15.96/NEWS/env0215.htm

  ill post some more if you like, about how big the hole in the ozone layer is, i doubt very much if its 120 years. i supose i could always random splice and throw in 40 years in the wilderness into the ring. but like i said im not a prophet, it is blatantly obvious that the the witnesses were wrong, considering that the 6th day hadnt ended till eve was created, so it has to be calculated from the end of the 6th day and the begining of the 7th but at least somone posted that shows the chronoligy is there, bye the way little toe its not a witness finding it was long before them.

  tell me little toe have you got a set of cracker jack pencils and pens. or did you go for the blue peter badge, personally i couldnt stand crackerjack, is the real reason for your comments too much jackanory and not enough of the news.

  netclocker
• 

  LittleToe

  That article is nine years old, and guess what? We're still here.

  Rumours of my demise have been greatly exagerrated...

  PS - I had neither badge nor pencils, but I did have double-sided sticky-tape.

  PPS - Regardless of whether it's an original idea (dubious, I know) or an adopted idea, it's still crackpot.
• 

  netclocker

  if thats how you choose to see it, then suit yourself, it would help figure out the 7 times of the gentiles though little toe, (nebucadnezar) i mean if you new when the 7 times ended 2005 then youd know when they began.

  i was a sticky back plastic man myself

  netclocker
• 

  LittleToe

  Believe it or not, a few of us have run around those hoops before. Your ideas aren't that original

  IMHO the "seven times" of the gentiles ended hundreds of years ago.
• 

  netclocker

  you could always try again, it certainly throws 607 bc out of the ring. the big captivity. all that cyrus stuff that doesnt fit. were archeology and religeon dissagree. because that would then date the jews going into slavery round about 515 bc. wouldnt it.

  netclocker
• 

  LittleToe

  None of it fits. Period.

  Try doing some research on the origins of the book of Daniel, especially its socio-political context, and you'll see that it has absolutely no bearing on modern day events. It wasn't even written when the WTS told us it was.

  I was crushed when this news was broken to me about four years ago. I feel for ya, bro...
• 

  funkyderek

  netclocker:

  it would help figure out the 7 times of the gentiles though

  There's no such thing. The phrase "times of the Gentiles," or "appointed times of the nations," is only found in Luke 21:24. There is no mention of "seven times" in that verse or anywhere near it. The idea that it has anything to do with the "seven times" mentioned in Daniel is just part of the Watchtower's "pick 'n' mix" approach to prophecy, and is scripturally indefensible.
• 

  netclocker

  
  little toe

  the problem i have with the book of daniel not being part of the bible, is the 42 months, im talking about the king of the north. isnt he the horn that grows between the 10 horns on the head of the 7 headed beast. because it sayes he will pluck 3 horns out and daniel sayes he will humiliate 3 kings. with the 42 months and the times time and half a time, then the 1260 days, [to me] keeps daniel as part of the bible. bye the way little toe. that king of the north thing dosnt fit history as world powers, but it does fit a lot better if you look on them as religeons, like christian muslim / moor. what do you think, it goes right back to the crusades.

  funy derek

  you can only pic and mix for a while, thats why most of us are here posting and not running off to the elders, only to be told that jehovah will reveal it time, and as usual through his earthly oranization, with the usual reminder of what an appostate is. what im posting has nothing to do with the witnesses it was there long before them.

  netcocker
• 

  LittleToe

  I don't have any difficulty with Daniel being part of the biblical canon (albeit I'd like to see Ecclessiasticus, etc. there too ).

  Have you researched alternative meanings to the 1290 and 1335 days, from critical sources? Many would place the events as BCE.