Greetings!
This is a terrible thing and a bad precedent for both those who wish to challenge the Society and for the Society too. My heart goes out to Peter and I am glad that I got my CD a long while ago. I have just a couple of comments:
1. I know that the case never got to court, but if the case had been brought to court in the U.S., Peter probably would have lost the case. Here's why. The doctrine of fair use requires that some "comment" (scientific, artistic, critical, etc.) be made upon the excerpted copyrighted material in order for it to be a permissable use. Peter's approach of using the material without any commenting upon it, while amirable in its objectivity, would probably have run afoul of copyright law in my opinion. (I don't know but suspect that Canadian law might be similar in that it requires some commentary upon the copyrighted material for it to be ok.)
2. I noticed that the settement agreement included WATCH TOWER, WATCHTOWER, AWAKE, and JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES "among the terms it has copyrighted (presumably in Canada) and that the agreement is binding "worldwide."
Just for your info a search of the USPTO reveals that "Watchtower," "Awake" (without the "!") are not the trademark/servicemark/wordmark, etc. of the Society in all cases and uses. I could not find that "Jehovah's Witnesses" was a registered mark at all even for a website.
But even so, persons with these names, including this domain/website - Simon - may wish to begin planning now to defend any attack by the Society to shut down their website.
-Eduardo Leaton Jr., Esq.