String theory and multiple universes were peer reviewed?
Until they are, all I have to say is those subjects are way cool to ponder when you're in an "altered state".
Although considering the universe we live is seemingly infinate in size, having to exlore more of them would make the head ache. :-)
Multiple Universes are aliens actual divine beings of the Bible
by zagor 31 Replies latest jw friends
-
Pastafarian
-
zagor
String theory and multiple universes were peer reviewed?
Mathematics behind them proves them for now, as it was case so many times with other theories before we had technology to test them fully.
Universe as you know is very much governed by predictable laws of mathematics. Use of the same laws so far boils down to string theory and it is not as trivial as you are trying to portray, my friend.If after concrete physical tests are done we disprove them - fine. But as it stands right now we cannot reject them in fact the more research is done the more feasible they seem. Which I guess also explain popularity of string research in graduate schools by many aspiring young physicists.
-
zagor
Although considering the universe we live is seemingly infinate in size, having to exlore more of them would make the head ache
This actually shows that you have fundamental misunderstanding of where those universes are, my friend. I would suggest to you to go to PBS website and watch about 3 hours long series of videos on string theory http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/
Just in case if you miss it on the site this is the direct link to videos themselves http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html
-
flyphisher
zagor.
People like your Mr. .... pop up everywhere. They have most extraordinary claims ranging from extracting energy form nothing to driving car on water alone
Did you read such a statement or claim in www.sensortime.com/time-e.html ? I did not.
Rather, he even decribed the NEURAL CODE (brain function) on base of his "elapse-time-theory".
-
flyphisher
zagor
...to be both falsifiable and verifiable needs to go through barrage of tests of scientific peers. That's is why we have magazines such as Nature..
Oh man, oh man...
If you are skilled in science, e.g. informatics, robotics and so on.., you certainly know that ONLY few high-grade-scientists (mostly members of freemasonry etc) have the privilege to publish !!! See Hwang Woo Suk ("cloning pioneer") - he published DOZENS of articles in magazines... And - is he a serious scientist ??
-
zagor
Fly, I admire your persistence and because of it, I'll try to fully read that article tomorrow morning. (it's time for me to go to sleep now) However, if your friend is such an expert why does he not submit his finding for analysis? He can go outside of Austria to test it. I'm sure there are people who would be happy to do it for him if there is any evidence of truth to it.
The fact is, though I do not like to even look into claims of would-be physicists who never entered a college and have most extraordinary claims. I' for one, have studied physics and know what it takes to have well-tuned insight. Physics is something you don't learn at home just by tinkering with things in your garage.
Also if your friend wants to be taken seriously he should also think seriously about changing the look, feel and above all else the content of his site.
The very scope of his alleged expertise would be mind-boggling i.e. from signal processing in brain (whatever that is) to unifying theory of quantum and special relativity theories. And all of that without any formal education?!!? Come on, get real.
The other thing what does “Divine name” have to do with science??? Really strange mix of “skills”
-
zagor
mostly members of freemasonry etc
Fly, cut it out, please. I was just a student and had my work published without being a free mason. That is the bullshit excuse often used by uninformed or people whose work was rejected because of lack of presentability of their work or findings. IF this gentleman you are taking side for is actually you. Take my advice and do some serious make-up of your website by people who know how to do proper marketing. Very colors of your site are screaming "conspiracy" you'll have to learn how to present yourself in a positive light. Simply, mourning in the corner and complaining at the world will not get you anywhere. If you are this gentlemen, send me a message I might try to help you and also put you in touch with people happy to test your findings, but please without dogmatism, I've had enough of that in WTBS for 10 lifetimes. -
Narkissos
One side question is whether this kind of theology-fiction, if scientifically correct, would satisfy the religious mind or not.
I suppose not. That is, in a way, non-existence is essential to gods. If they were proven to be part of reality somehow we would still be looking to something else beyond reality as an object of faith.
-
flyphisher
zagor
the grade someone I' for one, have studied physics and know what it takes to have well-tuned insight
Praises for you! But note: there are thousands of people who never attended a university having more skills, wisdom and knowledge than those who graduated as doctor.
You wrote about POPPER`s fallibilism. He never postulated, that the criteria of falsifibility depends on the grade someone received at the university.
fly (I have only "master" grade;-))
-
LittleToe
Didier:
One side question is whether this kind of theology-fiction, if scientifically correct, would satisfy the religious mind or not.
It would satisfy this one. It's something I pondered long ago.
I suppose not. That is, in a way, non-existence is essential to gods. If they were proven to be part of reality somehow we would still be looking to something else beyond reality as an object of faith.
??? What is "faith", if not that which convinces of the hope? While it may not be objectively verifiable so that it can be pointed at, does that reduce the ability for each to subjectively verify it for themselves? Or are you defining "reality" as merely the four dimensions that we currently perceive as objective reality?