Iran: Your Next !!!

by prophecor 63 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Deputy Dog
    Deputy Dog

    It wouldn't cost that much!

    A couple of bunker busters on their nuclear sites would end it real quick.

  • Spectrum
    Spectrum

    Oroborus

    "So please stop blindly parroting what the policy wonks and the Bush administration keep repeating as if to convince themselves that the U.S. is engaged in some righteous crusade to spread democracy and freedom around the world. Nothing could be further from the truth.
    If you believe that you are a fool.It is about money and power that is all it is about and to an extent it is about the desire to do something, however misguided, immoral or consequential, so as not to feel helpless in response to terrorism.
    "

    Beautifully said.

    I JUST WANT TO REMIND THE RIGHTEOUS ANTI-IRANIAN AMERICANS on this forum that despite the Iranian's misgivings they don't come close to US government crimes against humanity. So get off your high horses bow your heads in shame and beg for forgiveness.

    Vietman (mass killing of innocents)
    Chile(terrorism, political murder, kissinger)
    El Salvador (terrorism)
    Cuba (invasion)
    Nicaragua (terrorism)
    Israel (too sh*t scared not to support zionist white house infiltrators)
    Iraq (chemical sales, sanction killing babies)
    Algeria (supported Islamic fundamentalist village massacrers)
    Taliban ( help put them in power)
    Pakistan (support ruthless dictator)
    Philipines (supported meglomaniac)
    East Temor (mass murder)
    Native Americans (near extermination, kind of reminds you of the Nazis)
    And many others, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ADD TO THIS LIST

    I really don't see how any American can talk about Iran begin wicked. If you want to talk about about wicked first admit and repent of your own wickedness then you'll have some moral excuse to talk about others.

    Peace to all

  • DannyBloem
    DannyBloem
    It wouldn't cost that much!

    A couple of bunker busters on their nuclear sites would end it real quick.

    it will not be that simple. Iran is much more powerfull then Iraq was, and we just learned what it the price for that was.
    I heard here on the new about 2 billion. That is 2000 biljoen for americans. And what are they doing wrong by the way? Why can they do not have any nuclear weapons? We have them... It is like wanting all the candy's for yourself and telling other kids to p!ss off. Not that I am not worried if they would manage by the way, they have a quite scary leader now

  • greendawn
    greendawn

    Time will show, the USA administration has been for a long time making noises against Syria and Iran. Iran a mountainous country with nearly 70 million people is not an easy target, though they may intensely bomb them with long distance weapons such as cruise missiles especially if they try to develop nuclear weapons.

  • prophecor
    prophecor

    Spectrum, regretably, I must agree with your perspective. I didn't begin this as a " Lets Go Kick Some Iraninan @$$ next ", just wanted to take the pulse of interested ones on how they felt about the present administrations position on Iran, especially with Sharon's now being incapacitated as ruler of Israel, the hotbed of activity that can result from Israel's government of instability, as well as Iraq being right next door with the intense American prescense that exist there.

    I JUST WANT TO REMIND THE RIGHTEOUS ANTI-IRANIAN AMERICANS on this forum that despite the Iranian's misgivings they don't come close to US government crimes against humanity. So get off your high horses bow your heads in shame and beg for forgiveness.


    Vietman (mass killing of innocents)

    Chile(terrorism, political murder, kissinger)

    El Salvador (terrorism)

    Cuba (invasion)

    Nicaragua (terrorism)

    Israel (too sh*t scared not to support zionist white house infiltrators)

    Iraq (chemical sales, sanction killing babies)

    Algeria (supported Islamic fundamentalist village massacrers)

    Taliban ( help put them in power)

    Pakistan (support ruthless dictator)

    Philipines (supported meglomaniac)

    East Temor (mass murder)

    Native Americans (near extermination, kind of reminds you of the Nazis)

    And many others, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ADD TO THIS LIST


    I really don't see how any American can talk about Iran begin wicked. If you want to talk about about wicked first admit and repent of your own wickedness then you'll have some moral excuse to talk about others.


    Peace to all

  • Spectrum
    Spectrum

    prophecor,

    "Spectrum, regretably, I must agree with your perspective. I didn't begin this as a " Lets Go Kick Some Iraninan @$$ next ",
    "

    Ok sorry, I misunderstood you. I sensed glee in phrasing of your title but I was wrong. However everything I said still stands for those that take that ignorant nationalistic stance.

  • under74
    under74
    Not even George W Bush is that stupid.

    he's not? this is the same guy who flew in airforce one over N.O. rather actually touching ground. He's even said he doesn't read the news....so what would he know about the rest of the world?

    As far as people from Iraq and Iran all believing Hammas is right....I totally disagree. Most of the people from Iraq I know are pro-Bush the ones that aren't pro-Bush just don't want their family in Iraq to be harmed in this war. The Iranians I know are against the war but aren't pro-terrorist. Most of the friends that I have that are Iranian think open conversation could solve problems.

    As far as Iran and nuclear weapons go...they aren't all crazy. Maybe it more has to do with 1) being able to provide electrical power the same way the US and other western countries do 2) standing up to the west (US) who typically look at them as children too crazy to handle their own matters. 3) They don't have any power without against invasion without nuclear power. Pakistan has it why can't Iran?

    IMO if the US wants to have a moral or ethical stand on this we shouldn't be using nuclear power or producing nuclear weapons. And just because some guy makes anti-israel speeches shouldn't mean they are ripe for invasion. I've met a lot of anti-semetic people in Idaho....should we bomb Idaho? Sure he's a leader but I seriously don't see the difference between him and Bush...cept Bush has actually acted on his words which has left many dead.

    Spectrum- you forgot Honduras, Panama, Cambodia, Guatemala, recent events against Chevez in Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, Democratic Republic of the Congo , Uruguay, Puerto Rico, Lebanon, Laos, Indonesia, Angola, Grenada, Libya, Dominican Republic....and I can come up with more but need to log off soon.

  • heathen
    heathen
    I would also add that these are sovereign nations that have the fundamental human right to arm and protect themselves, including developing and possessing nuclear weapons,

    I don't think anybody should be developing nuclear weapons . The US is paranoid that extremists will get ahold of nuclear arms and attack the US or Israel. We don't need that either . I really can't blame them for hating the US , what are you going to do as stated earlier, kill people just because the don't like you and wish you harm ? The US does not even have UN support for it's current actions , nothing it has done lately was democratic so we can't say they are promoting democracy . Iraq was about personal power and wealth , hell they even created an energy crisis so people would find it easier to accept what is going since Iraq has the worlds second largest oil reserve . I think once the Iatola lost most his power the Islamic attitude in Iran has melowed out alot .I don't have a problem with them wanting nuclear power to generate power , jeeze Israel took their nuclear program in the wrong direction and everybody just ignored it . What makes them so friggen special ? Now today they are threatening a nuclear strike , now what the hell good is going to come out of that cannot be ascertained.

  • Spectrum
    Spectrum

    Under,

    "IMO if the US wants to have a moral or ethical stand on this we shouldn't be using nuclear power or producing nuclear weapons."

    In reality the US is not interested in a moral or ethical stance, their interest is in world domination of resources. An Iran with nukes probably puts paid to that dream.
    Also if they were ethical about nukes they would never have given the Israelis nuke technology.

  • MegaDude
    MegaDude


    The answer is simple. Iran shouldn't have nuclear weapons. Israel will probably end up bombing Iran's nuclear research sites since the president of Iran has expressed his view that Isreal should be wiped off the map. Will Europe do the right thing and do the smart thing and apply ENOUGH pressure to Iran? No. They only do what America does. They act in their own financial self-interest. There will be the predictable public hand-wringing and UN resolutions passed, maybe a few sanctions passed. Lots of passionate rhetoric will be dolloped out for mass consumption on television. Different nations will claim the moral high-ground. Don't be fooled. It's all for show. The nations of the world will jockey for power and influence in Iran but it has nothing to do with doing the smart thing, the wise thing, making the world a safer place for everybody, or even what's good for the people of Iran. It's all about ruthless self-interest.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit