HI Moe: Elders meeting are at least once a month, commonly Sunday after the meeting or before, depending on the regular meeting schedule. These meetings are usually about general congregation business and activity, such as, upcoming CO visit, assemblies, building funds and planned activity, etc. Sometimes this time will be used to make JC assignments, but not always.
When we had JC actions, we usually made the assignments by phone as early as possible, and then the JC would meet whenever it was convenient to discuss the matter.
I would not be too concerned about Internet posting unless you give too many specifics. Detailed information may be read by a WTS troll and passed along to figure out who you may be. But, the USA is a big place with lots of congregations, so it would take a lot of details. The Elders normally don't troll the ex-JW forums, so the likihood is not great, but possible that they might figure you out. If you are vague and discreet in your comments, it is nearly impossible to figure you out.
If I were still in the organization, and had concerns over losing fellowship with family, I would be very discreet. In addition, were I asked about ex-JW material (apostate) I would be so vague and non-committal that they would never figure me out. Here is an example of a common question:
"Do you, or do you not accept that this is Jehovah's Organization?"
This type of question is hard to sidestep using a 'Bill Clinton' style, but it can be done. Here are some possible ways to respond:
1. To the extent that Jehovah uses this Organization, it must be his.
2. I can think of no other organization that could be called Jehovah's Organization.
My favorite, and it is a clincher to keep you off the hook:
3. Of course this is Jehovah's Organization, for no other Organization claims to be his exclusive channel of truth.
Am I playing with words? You bet! But, this is an issue where you have to decide how you feel you can best answer IF you are asked such things.
Sometimes, answering a question with a question can be effective, if done wisely. here is one example:
"Do you accept the organization's teaching that Jesus returned invisibly in 1914?"
1. Of couse Jesus returned, and has been so invisibly, why would you think otherwise?
2. Why are you asking me such a question, do you have doubts? Are you becoming apostate? Maybe I need to mreport you to the CO?
3. I have no doubts whatsoever about the meaning of the year 1914, and I am content to wait on the Organization for further progressive insight.
If you parse and analyze these suggested responses, they sound confirmatory, but really say little, and can be taken different ways.
I was confronted directly about 'this' being Jehovah's Organization by the CO during the time that I was leaving and not going to meetings. I just acted insulted that the CO would even consider such a question, and he backed off.
I hope these suggestions are useful to you, but if you feel that they are not in conformance with your sense of honesty, then don't use them, and just hope that you never have to face the Elders on these issues. - Amazing