Schizm, Scholar and other WT defenders

by 2112 58 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • THE SHOOTIST
    THE SHOOTIST

    The problem I have with scholar, schism and other defenders like PMJ are their blatant refusals to be logical. They're not here to learn but only to try and tear down any reasoning that goes contrary to the Bible or the WTS. Because of being involved with the society for 49 years and serving in many different capacities of responsiblility, I understand WT reasoning as well as any witness. I understand only too well circular reasoning. It kind of reminds me of a dog chasing his tail, always going in circles and never getting anywhere. That's exactly how I feel when I read Scholars posts on 607 B.C. When I pulled my head out of my ass, no more circular reasoning, and started to study the various religions and their saviours, world history other than works tainted by the WT, science, the true history of the Bible (not the fictional All Scriptures Inspired and Benefical crap),and archaeology as something other than tools of Satan to blind us, only then were my eyes opened. There are some people on this board that are that are in different stages of recovery from WT damage. When I initially left the organization, I had some of my friends tell me some of the things they came to believe and I thought they had fell off the wagon, you know, lost their minds. Now some of my conclusions are the same as theirs. It took me constant research and 5 years of recovery to get to this point in my life. I will not tell you I have the answers to life and God, I can only tell for sure that JWs don't. I think that finding God is not done in the Bible because Jehovah is a fiend and a failure. Any logical examination of the Genesis account of creation, original sin, death and the ransom are the ramblings of men depicting an insane and unreasonable God. God has to be bigger than the Bible and this whole earthly scene has to be something besides the good and evil circular reasoning presented by so many religions today. I see a lot of x-witnesses running from one religious judgemental trap and fall into another. Most people can't live without the thought of being born in sin and needing a ransomer and that they're never good enough and they have to find some person or group to tell them about God and what he wants and where to send their money for salvation. I know I've got a lot to learn as life goes along, but unreasoning WT defenders will never again be my instructors!!! I probably just need to laugh at the antics of Scholar, Schizm, and PMJ rather that give them a reply.

  • PMJ
    PMJ

    WELL U JUST DID GIVE US A KINDA REOLY LOL.LISTEN U BELEIVIVE I WANT TRY PULL U DOWN U ALONE ANSWER TO GOD.

  • Clam
    Clam

    Excellent post Shootist

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro
    WELL U JUST DID GIVE US A KINDA REOLY LOL.LISTEN U BELEIVIVE I WANT TRY PULL U DOWN U ALONE ANSWER TO GOD.

    Cool. If it's only "The Shootist" who "alone answer[s] to god"', then the rest of us are in the clear.

  • PMJ
    PMJ

    YEP UR IN THE CLEAR ITS ONLY SHOOTIST WHO HAS TO ANSWER TO GODYOUR SO FUNNY PLEASE POST MORE

  • skyman
    skyman

    PMJ don;t ever think you or I could never be wrong. When a person starts to think this way I believe they are lost and are fools. Always have an open mind even when you think there is now possible way you could be wrong. I did not create the universe so I can be wrong only a arrogant fool thinks he can't be wrong. Don't you be a fool PMJ. I am not because I am willing the change how about you?

  • Hellrider
    Hellrider
    LOL WHAT THAT I COULDNT UNDERSTAND IT LOL JUST KIDDING.YEP I AGREE WITH WHAT U JUST SAID.IS JUST THE CASE OF ME BEING CRAP AT SPELLING I WAS A REBAL WHEN I WAS YOUGER AND NEVER WENT TO SCHOOL.BUT IVE GOT MY ACT TOGTHER NAD HAVE A GOOD JOB THAT PAYS REALY GOOD MONEY.BUT IT DOESNT INVOLVE ANY SPELLING.LOL RESPECT

    Yeah, I wish everyone would give PMJ a break on the spelling. It`s a cheap way of attacking him, and makes us look foolish. But PMJ: I`m a teacher (not english though), and I do think I recognise certain things in your spelling. It really does look dyslectic. Your letters "switch places", and I also see that you only use big letters, all very typical of dyslectic kids I`ve had. Big letters make it a little easier, right? I think you should go and have this checked out. To bad they didn`t do that while you were in school, it would have made it easier for you. I`ve seen those rebelling kids, with an underlying dyslexia way to often. They just think they`re dumb, while in fact, it`s something else. Everyone should get over your spelling, and then we could talk about what`s important instead. Like the fact that your wife is pregnant and may have to have a blood transfusion if something goes wrong, because of her condition. This is important, PMJ, more important than you may recognise at the moment. You really should take up AuldSould on this issue, and discuss it thoroughly with him!!!

  • scholar
    scholar

    THE SHOOTIST

    The best example of circular reasoning is that nonsense presented as the Jonsson hypothesis in Gentile Times Reconsidered, 2004 by apostate Carl O. Jonsson followed by the posts of Jethro trying to present another alternative chronology.

    scholar JW

  • ackack
    ackack

    On most boards, trolls like PMJ would be banned. Though I understand the argument that he acts as a cautionary example, his all caps no spelling approach is blatant trolling.

    Scholar: Wow, more circular that 1914 is right because of 607 and 607 must be right because of 1914?

    ackack

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    The best example of circular reasoning is that nonsense presented as the Jonsson hypothesis in Gentile Times Reconsidered, 2004 by apostate Carl O. Jonsson followed by the posts of Jethro trying to present another alternative chronology.

    there you go -attacking the messenger again. Jonnson is well respected - even if you do not like it scholar

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit