by prophecor 58 Replies latest watchtower scandals
So OBL has loyalty, and SH had millions of dollars around him. Who is still free?
OBL must be good at convincing others to follow him, and SH was better at making people scared of him to follow him. Which is more powerful?
I don't remember SH enlisting any suicide bombers to protect his country. Why is that? SH had scud missles, OBL has suicide bombers. Which is the greater power?
weapons or words?
True, but at least he'll be dead and good riddance I say. Anyone who thinks the "war against terror" is wrong is IMO an enemy of the American way of life.
Right on.....
To EnigmaOne....
True, terrorism is a tactic, but it's a tactic that must be learned, organized in some way and carried out. If you can interrupt portions of the 'supply chain' as it were, then you can help disrupt the tactic. OBL's too busy running for his life to be able to carry on a well-organized (note I said WELL organized) campaign. His latest message is a "let me be and I'll let you be" ploy. Of course he's going to issues 'warnings' - he has to make some kind of threat to keep his kooky followers happy.
ahhh, yes! i have been looking for a label for myself. thanks for that...
Glad to help.....
Really, you Republicans need to face the music and stop blaming others. Clinton's been gone for quite a while now.
See, that's the difference. Liberals place blame with no solution of their own - Republicans deal with the problem.
Clinton wasn't gone for more than a few months on 9/11/01......
let's git 'im!! YEEEE HAAWWW!! ALLAH ALLAH JESUS JESUS KRAMER KRAMER!!
See, that's the difference. Liberals place blame with no solution of their own - Republicans deal with the problem.
Yeah the republicans deal with the problem by blaming it on Clinton.
Who are you calling Liberal? It had better not be me.
Not many people remember this about Ollie. Osama was THE reason that Ollie was so concerned about a high-dollar security system. Osama was threatening Ollie for the government's action (or rather, inaction) in the waning years of the Afghan/Russia conflict. Funny how people don't realize that Osama's been a problem for nearly two decades.....
Um, um... refer to earlier post about this being an urban legend... http://www.snopes.com/rumors/north.asp
Yeah the republicans deal with the problem by blaming it on Clinton.Who are you calling Liberal? It had better not be me.
Nope...just liberals in general. I don't remember mentioning anyone by name.
The only time blame is put on Clinton is when the finger is pointed at the current administration with the statement that "You (GW administration) allowed this to happen." This simply is not true. There is no easy fix for the current 'terrorist' problem, but at least something is being done. I'd love to see anyone, liberal, conservative, anyone come up with a sure fire solution to the terror problem. That can't happen, but everything that this administration tries to do is blasted by the liberals who are just mad that they have lost touch with mainstream America and can't win an election even against GW. As a result, GW can't do anything right.
To be fair, the OBL problem started when Reagan funded his revolt against the Soviet's, then turned around and cut him loose when he was no longer needed. Clinton cut defense spending so much that wacko's like OBL thought they could get away with murder (literally) because at that time this 'superpower' was living on past reputation only.
I just like pulling the anti-Busher's chains. They get SO mad while I sit back and laugh. It's like teasing that kid in school that the only reason you do it is to see them cry.....
let's git 'im!! YEEEE HAAWWW!! ALLAH ALLAH JESUS JESUS KRAMER KRAMER!!
Hate to tell ya, but not everyone who supports Bush is an ignorant redneck. But if it makes you feel better to think that, then go ahead. Who's Kramer?
| Jehovah's Witnesses Vow To Find Osama |
|
