ok, i'll comment without ever having seen the movie too.
"brokeback mountain" isn't a guy movie.
"brokeback mountain" isn't a chickflick.
"brokeback mountain" isn't mainstream america.
"brokeback mountain" isn't "cool" to watch.
why didn't they make the characters two dirty sweaty guys fighting off the "gooks" in vietnam? why didn't they sprinkle the "human love" story with machine guns and napalm? throw some seedy scenes of the "boys" watching trampy hookers take it all off. generate some interest from the male hetero popuplation? maybe if they did more straight guys would wanna watch.
why didn't they make one of the characters a beautiful girl disguised as a guy who falls in love with another guy who happens to be gay who falls in love with a person he thinks is a guy but turns out to be a beautiful girl? that would have made a better story for us girls. throw in some shopping scenes. a great scene where the girl reveals her true identity and the real gay guy abandons his "gayness" and falls head over heels in love with the girl and they live happily ever after.
or for the bible belt americans...these two gay guys can "come to the lord" (no pun intended) and leave behind (again no pun) their satanic homosexual sickness and ride bicycles donning name badges and crisp white shirts into the sunset?
what were the movie people thinking? making a movie that regular guys don't want to watch. women aren't really interested and 95% of god fearing americans shouldn't watch?
hmmm
maybe there's been a societal shift in the last 10 years. and women love gay shows...and guys are starting to tolerate it...and bible thumpers are softening their views.
i'm not sure.
what i do know. it's only a movie people.
but, then woodstock was only another concert.
somewhere in the future we may look back at brokeback as a mainstream eye opener.
or not.
oh and btw stillajwexelder i'm flattered lol
inserts gratuitous boob flash for the heteros: