Just for the record.
I do not consider the condemnation of homosexuality to be prejudice. If a witness said something like, all homosexuals are pedophiles however, that I would consider a prejudicial and uninformed statement.
I think prejudice is the wrong word. Jehovah's Witnesses are certainly intolerant, but then, they believe that they should be intolerant. In fact, that is a core belief of theirs, that there is a "right way to be" and every other life choice is wrong and deserving of destruction. They believe god is also intolerant.
It is not their intolerance I have against witnesses. Indeed, if they all lived up to their own specified way of life, I would probably still be a witness. No it is the double standard they apply that moves them into the realm of the ludicrous for me.
If a non-witness does something bad they are wicked and deserving of destruction. If a witness does something bad they are just imperfect since they had a "get out of armageddon free" card by calling themselves a Jehovah's Witness. What is really odd is that every sexual pecadillo is policed and punished to the extreme while ongoing gossip, slander, reviling, hypocrisy, unkindness, cheating and questionable politicking for position is all just tacitly accepted because the brotherhood is imperfect.
No, if there is a god, we will answer to him individually for the way we treat our fellow man. Love will be the scorecard, not a set of doctrines or interpretations or a label we have placed on ourselves.