Pedophilia with 3-year old slave girls in the Bible!

by mike87 37 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • mike87
    mike87

    girls at the age of 3 were forced into sex in both the talmud and the bible. Also, the age consent in US AND Europe WAS AS LOW AS 10:

    http://www.answering-christianity.com/age3.htm

  • greendawn
    greendawn

    The claim that Moses instructed the Jews to have sex with three year old girls is not supported in the Bible there it talks about taking virgin girls but doesn't refer to exact age for intercourse. If the talmudic rabbis saw in those verses three year old girls that's another matter.

  • Double Edge
    Double Edge
    The claim that Moses instructed the Jews to have sex with three year old girls is not supported in the Bible there it talks about taking virgin girls but doesn't refer to exact age for intercourse. If the talmudic rabbis saw in those verses three year old girls that's another matter.

    EXACTLY..... couldn't have said it better.

  • juni
    juni

    Personally I feel that the poster here, Mike87, has porn and pedophilia on his brain.

    I have a bad gut feeling about this poster.

    Juni

  • mike87
    mike87

    what about dashing little children against rocks as a form of revange in the book of psalm?

    PS: to see the verse go to the same link i provided above.

  • ballistic
    ballistic

    mike87, do you even know who we are, and care to introuce yourself?

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere
    The claim that Moses instructed the Jews to have sex with three year old girls is not supported in the Bible there it talks about taking virgin girls but doesn't refer to exact age for intercourse.

    Which means that we don't know what age they had sex with the girls, meaning age was not at issue for them. I have never read a scripture saying "Take all of the virgins for your self, except for the ones under 18".

  • Hellrider
    Hellrider

    He is right about the violence you know:

    1Samuel: 15:3 So go now and strike down the Amalekites. Destroy everything that they have. Don’t spare them. Put them to death – man, woman, child, infant, ox, sheep, camel, and donkey alike.’”

    Psalm 137:9 How blessed will be the one who grabs your babies and smashes them on a rock!

    It`s sick. It was sick back then, and it is sick now, and it is proof to me that not every word in the Bible is "inspired", even if I were to accept the God of the Bible.

    Mike, you should know that this is an ex-JW-forum, so if you`re here to just preach, it`s not necessary. There`s a healthy mixture of atheists, agnostics and religious people here. No need to come on so strong.

  • James Free
    James Free

    Ah but Witnesses are told they were Amalekites and God said it was ok coz the parents were so wicked, so God was really loving when he said to exterminate them, babies and all. When King Saul disagreed, in order to increase his own wealth, he was rejected by God.

    I always knew these accounts, but being out of the Org. really makes a difference in how I read them. I just can't imagine Jesus agreeing with it either.

    Perhaps that's why Jesus never came back - perhaps after living as a human and seeing all the terrible suffering, he had a few choice words for his Father when he got back to heaven??

  • ozziepost
    ozziepost
    Personally I feel that the poster here, Mike87, has porn and pedophilia on his brain.

    I have a bad gut feeling about this poster.

    juni: You and me both !

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit