Pedophilia with 3-year old slave girls in the Bible! (page 2)

ozziepost

Clam:

Actually i loathe using the dlete button in principle but there comes a time and..............well, juni said it all.

It seemed to me mike87 was 'anti-bible', anti-porn and against the Bible practices he found written therein. Rabbis may have had their own interpretation, so what ? Age is not mentioned -- we don't know, do we ?

If someone can condone "smashing babies to death on rocks..." and "being blessed' ...what else are they capable of doing ?

It is a Bible fact the Jews were allowed to kill all the men and rape virgins and any other woman of 'non-Israelite' nations that were in their way during their travels.

Rabbit

Clam

Clam:
Actually i loathe using the dlete button in principle but there comes a time and..............well, juni said it all.

Good for you ozzie. If only this type of person could be so easily deleted in the real world.

stillajwexelder

3500 years ago -I think we have moved on -but if Islam is supposed to be the superior religion and supplanted Judaism and Christainity, they should also move on - WHAT IS HAPPENING NOW IS WHAT MATTERS

Hellrider

Stilla: If you believe the Bible is Gods words, does it really matter how long ago God commanded, or said it was ok, to do these things?

stillAwitness

Interesting topic. I have found that the more I read about the Bible the more is called to my attention. So many weird verses and peculiar stories about bible characters.

Forscher

Here is th biblical verse that was cited to prove the claim about sex at three years of age:
Numbers 31:17-18 "Now kill all the boys [innocent kids]. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man."

The Biblical verse doesn't give the age as was pointed out earlier. He inferred it from the talmudic passage:
Said Rabbi Joseph, "Come and take note: A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. And if a Levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her. And one can be liable on her account because of the law prohibiting intercourse with a married woman. And she imparts uncleanness to him who has intercourse with her when she is menstruating, to convey uncleanness to the lower as to the upper layer [of what lies beneath]. If she was married to a priest, she may eat food in the status of priestly rations. If one of those who are unfit for marriage with her had intercourse with her, he has rendered her unfit to marry into the priesthood. If any of those who are forbidden in the Torah to have intercourse with her had intercourse with her, he is put to death on her account, but she is free of responsibility [M.Nid. 5:4].
Sanhedrin 7/55B [132]

Again, as pointed out earlier that is a horse of a different color. We all know that the leaders of Jesus day were corrupt and perverted. So it is no surprise that they would see nothing wrong with that perversion. By the way, I am aware that the Talmud was written a few centuries later, but many of the Rabbis it cited were contemporaries of Jesus. That is why my statement.

Forscher

Forscher

By the way, did anyone note that the Talmudic passage associate menstruation with a three year old girl? I noticed it after my post. What would you like to bet that the number was mistranslated and should read "13 years and one day"? That would make more sense in that passage.

Forscher

Pedophilia with 3-year old slave girls in the Bible!

Share this