Apostate Kate: I don't recall anyone claiming the modern science can "comprehend" the universe. In fact, I don't actually know for sure what you mean by that, as though science is a living thing that "comprehends". Perhaps you don't quite know what science is. In any case, noone made that claim, whatever that claim may have been.
Just what is "an individual's reality"? By the very definition of the word, there can be only one "reality". Surely you must mean "thoughts" or "subjective experience" or something more like that.
I don't recall anyone "condoning or negating" anyone's "subjective experience".
Everyone: I do, however, resolutely reject the notion that one's subjective experience can be elevated to the level of objective reality, as is often attempted by people who can't tell the difference between what is clearly a subjective experience, and something objective or real.
If it's objective, then I should have equal access to it. If it's not, then don't expect to be able to have a cohesive discussion about it, because it's happening exclusively in your own head.
You people who propogate this BS about paranormal events are essentially elitist and condescending, inherently implying that you have access to knowledge that most others do not. If I don't believe your crackpot nonsense, it's because I've "never had an experience", and the typical insinuation is that it's because I'm somehow too ignorant to have one, or that my eyes are closed to them, or I've already made up my mind not to have them, while somehow you are just magically able to see them with no apparent effort.
What a load of egotistical, condescending, self-important crap.
Just shut up and show me the money. If you've got evidence, let me examine it and decide for myself. If not, quit pretending you know something I don't.
