I needed anti-nausea medication to get through this thread. The best comment was from skally, to reiterate : boo-f**king-hoo!!!
What we are seeing here is the classic "Albert Speer" Nuremberg defense in action: "Sure he served on a board of directors responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent children, an enforcer of the most absurd and mind-controlling, cultish rule systems leading to the destruction of countless lives, the breakdowns of countless families....but gosh darn it !! Dan gave such wonderful talks and was such a swell guy!! HE WAS ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS! He was only 1 voice !!! What could he have done???
Bullocks!!! Sydlik had choices. He could have looked around at the destructive effects his fellow GB members were creating and made a REAL effort to effect change, as Ray Franz did. But no, he was more than happy to maintain the "status quo" at Brooklyn and enjoy the perks of power along with Henschel, Jaracz and all the other bony old farts. For gawds sake people, Josef Goebbels was also a great speaker, which apparently said little for the man's underlying character. I have heard Sydliks talks, and the word best describing him was "slick".....
The very title of this thread is ridiculous. The definition of a "FORCE" is something that effects CHANGE. Sydlik did nothing of the sort and failed to "moderate" ANY of the watchtower policies.
The only thing sad here is the memory of the lives lost to the policies Sydlik contributed to and supported. As for him, just another wasted and impotent life, devoted to the service of a cult.
>Hasta la vista, Dan.......