In other posts I've commented on how profoundly Tom Cabeen's essay, "Does God Work Through an Organization," affected me when I read it on September 15th, 2004. Somehow realizing that the scriptures do NOT actually teach this helped me to see that the Watchtower Society was not what it claimed to be. Read it here if you like... http://www.brci.org/Attachments/Org.pdf
That said, I intend to share this information (where I can) with those current JWs who'll let me. And I want to be prepared if there is legitimate fault to be found with this information. What I'd like is for those of you so disposed to tell me if the following information is sound--and what you think JWs might counter with if faced with it...
The Mosaic Law gave moral and religious guidance to the Israelites. It provided extensive definitions
of sinful thoughts or actions that could occur in every facet of everyday life, along with specific
procedures for dealing with that sinfulness. But it did not set up any human form of government or
administrative body. Under the Law, the Israelites were to be guided by personal conscience rather than
human rulers who enforced governmental power through police or other armed forces. The people
themselves, under the supervision of the elders, carried out sanctions against sinners or lawbreakers in
each community. The priests supervised the accompanying offerings and other religious procedures.
Each individual was responsible for his own behavior before God, his family and the community. This
was a theocratic form of government in its true sense:
God himself acted in place of any earthly king.
Is this accurate? Is there any reason to believe that God did set up an "administrative body" on earth as part of the Mosaic Law?