A wise sage once said;
"You can't get wet from the WORD water".
No matter what you call the witnesses; cult or otherwise, they are what they are. Some people throw out the word "cult" in an effort to blanket label them in a derogatory way, which I feel they are very deserving of. But it's interesting what the "actual definition of "cult" is:
Main Entry: cult ![]()
Pronunciation: 'k<
Function: noun
Usage: often attributive
Etymology: French & Latin; French culte, from Latin cultus care, adoration, from colere to cultivate -- more at WHEEL
1 : formal religious veneration : WORSHIP
2 : a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents
3 : a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also : its body of adherents
4 : a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator <health cults>
5 a : great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work (as a film or book); especially : such devotion regarded as a literary or intellectual fad b : a usually small group of people characterized by such devotion
...actually the witnesses qualify under all (5) of the definitions, to a greater or lesser degree.
I don't know how much more definitive it gets than coming from Websters Dictionary. But Websters definition is less prickly than what a lot of individuals who throw out the "witnesses are a cult" statements would undoubtedly prefer.
In my opinion, in "official' terminology or description, the witnesses are indeed a "cult".
Are they "Jim Jones" style? No. The witnesses won't shoot you with a machine gun if you leave the district assembly early, but in other ways they can be similarly destructive in the way they attempt (either directly, or indirectly with "good" intentions) your very soul.
Thanks,
Integ.