DeputyDog,
Member / Associate member, you're splitting hairs! They helped to spread / endorse UN propaganda to thier membership.
Nope. Not splitting hairs. I personally agree with you.
However, I also see that whether or not they endorsed the UN or spread its propaganda is entirely in the eye of the beholder (open to interpretation), while whether or not they chose to become a member (Associate if a class of membership) of an organization they have labeled as "under judgment by Jehovah God" is black and white, cold...dispassionate...hard...indisputable...fact.
Also, spreading propaganda for the UN makes what they did worse, but becoming a member of the UN/DPI was (according to their standards) a willful rejection of Christian standards.
Additionally, sending representatives to speak before governmental bodies has never required membership or affiliation with the bodies before which they represent themselves. They have done this for many decades. The Judiciary is one branch of US government, for example. They have lobbied for or against certain measures in the US legislature, another branch of US government. They have used donated funds to do so. They have reported widely on their efforts to establish legal precedent in the court systems of the world.
They say, in effect, "Do as we say, not as we do." They judge adversely those who imitate their behavior, a practice Romans 2:1, 2 properly calls, "inexcusable."
Respectfully,
AuldSoul