Uh oh. The June 6, 2006 BoE porn letter is up on the web at reexamine.org. It is in a jpg format right now.
I wonder how it got up there...
by Jourles 19 Replies latest jw friends
Uh oh. The June 6, 2006 BoE porn letter is up on the web at reexamine.org. It is in a jpg format right now.
I wonder how it got up there...
Thank you. That just gave me the heeby jeebys, reading the files. Can you imagine the body of elders sitting around discussing the kind of porn they've watched. How's bringing the beers? I can hear it now, "Oh, that's okay, it least it wasn't gay men, then we'd have to remove you, he-he."
I will never allow my daughters to attend a meeting with the elders when they get older. This is just very disturbing.
I can download and open the file (three of them), but its to small to read it. Am I doing something wrong?
Wow, thanks! I've been wanting to see this thing!
Thank you for posting this.
I was unable to find it on the site, other than via your hyprtlink?
I placed the JPEGs into a PDF (3 MB).
If someone would like the PDF e-mailed to them, PM me your e-mail address.
Interesting letter - how can print this out on regular size paper?
When I downloaded it [I have dial up so it is slow] - it came out in a very large format that I cannot print all at once. Can someone help me know how to work with JPG to get it to a printable size and format?
jeff
Can someone help me know how to work with JPG to get it to a printable size and format?
Try placing it in a MSWord file or PowerPoint. Also, most operating systems allow you to print a JPG and supply a wizard to walk you through.
As I mentioned above, I have it in PDF but ...on dial-up, 3MB might take a while.
OK, here is a pdf version of the entire letter ---
Interesting letter. Since the letter only refers to "brothers" viewing porn, I must assume that it's ok for the sisters to do so.
W
Ack!
It makes my head hurt.
Forget that it is "degrading", child porn is ILLEGAL. If it becomes known to the BoE that somebody in the cong is in possesion of that s**t that f****r should be handed over to the cops without a moment's notice.
If the WTS is keeping that kind of information a private congregation matter aren't they setting the bOrg up to be accomplaces (sp?) if the child porn viewer begins abusing children themselves?