DEMONSTRATION: A brother decides to search on the Internet for progress reports on the JW Hurrican Katrina relief work. He uses a search engine (not specified which search engine) and finds an article.
Then he says, "What's this? Negative talk about the Governing Body? I don't need this, the society mentioned about apostates opposing us on the Internet. I think I'll go to the official website of the Watchower"
...where there was little or no mention of the relief work for Hurricane Katrina.
They've managed to kill three birds with one stone with this talk and demo. Porn is bad, the Internet is bad and don't question the Governing Body.
I mentioned on another thread that I think they are highlighting porn as an issue because to most conservative, religious types, porn is bad. So to hear the WTS go on about it doesn't raise any eyebrows, they are rightfully concerned that some people are letting it into their lives. But the underlying message is, "Don't use the Internet too much" How best to avoid porn? Stay away from the source...the source being the Internet for most people these days.
It could also be the groundwork for calling anything that is "apostate" in nature to be labeled "spiritual pornography". If they create a auro of disgustedness around anything that questions the WTS, then it may help keep people from relying on the Internet to search out answers to their doubts. For years, the word "apostate" worked to keep most JWs in line. That isn't working so well anymore, so they've got to find another way to keep the dubs in line. Take another word and redefine it to meet your needs just like happened with the word "apostate". And if necessary, those who admit to finding out about negative things about the WTS by use of the Internet could be DFd for purposely viewing "spiritual pornography".