Naeblis, you are so inquisitive this weekend! I might have to actually dust off one of my Bibles for this.
: Though in Moses case it wasn't necessarily a prophecy.
Well, God certainly did use Moses as a prophet. He was supposed to lead the Hebrews into to promised land. He didn't, even though he certainly was physically able to do so.
: Also, in Jonah's case that's not really the same thing is it? God told him directly it would happen and then TOLD him he was changing his mind. It's not as if he prophecied something and then simply didn't happen for no reason besides the fact that he was worng about it.
Okay. I guess sometimes I read the Bible without any reverence for God or his divine ability to screw with humans whenever he feels like it. When I read about a Bible prophet or a story that involves God and his actions, I break it down to what might have really been going on. So in Jonah's case, when he preached the destruction and it didn't happen, he was wrong, regardless of what voices he heard in his head. I guess my way of looking at such things might not be too helpful for the Bible believer to grasp and accept.
: Now the Tyre example is a different story and I've often wondered about it. Do you know of anywhere where the witnesses have dealt with this seeming error? (and I'll look for the book)
Yeah, get the book. try www.elihubooks.com if it's still operating. Took them a couple of weeks to get me mine, though. That was a couple of years ago.
In medieval times Tyre was destroyed and today it is a small, poor town, but for centuries after Alexander the Great's siege it prospered to an extent. The Society says that Ezekiel 26:14 does not say that the land would be completely uninhabited. It says that Tyre would never regain its former prosperity.
: Also, and thisis not solely directed to you as I understand that you don't necessarily believe the prophets and such to be true, but what does this say of the prophets in general?
Like I've said, most of what prophets say is hyperbole, whether intended or not. This is of course not limited to biblical prophets.
: Why is this prophecy wrong? Did the prophet just screw up?
: My point being that it was tailored to have a certain message, failed prophecies and less influential books left out of the process. Why does this remain?
Good question. Just like, why do so many NT canonical books contain so many discrepancies with each other? Why does the whole of the NT say that Jesus is coming back imminently? Especially why if some of the pastorals were written perhaps 100+ years after Jesus' death?
I dunno. A good line from _American Beauty_ is: "Never underestimate the power of denial." I think that is very true when it comes to religious people's attitudes towards goofy things said in the Bible (or other holy books) that never came true and/or are beyond reasonability.