Do you buy into conspiracy theories?

by free2beme 60 Replies latest jw friends

  • Justice-One
    Justice-One
    It is fun but when you disprove something again and again and again and people just say nope not listening! That's when it stops being fun!

    So the Warren Commission got it right huh.

  • mkr32208
    mkr32208

    I don't know about running down the stairs but he was older than sh..... Well he was old! He did use a EXACT replica of the gun! I guess he's been doing this for years to show it's possible. He had Oswalds military training book too showing where he had scored expert or some such crap! I didn't take notes but they showed how it was clearly possible and the "magic bullet" was all wrong. I thought they made a GREAT point that more Americans' NOW believe it's a conspiracy after that idiotic movie than believed it at the time.

    Anyone who still believes that Kennedy was assassinated by a conspiracy should watch this show!

    Now I'll tell yall what I DO believe. (as if you care!) I believe that there WAS a government conspiracy to kill Kennedy I believe that the conspiracy was going to make their play very close to the Dallas events. I think that Oswald came out of NOWHERE and was successful and left them with no time to finish covering their tracks! So in the hubbub around the REAL assasination parts of the future assasination came to light! Enough that conspiracy theories were born! They were helped by a clearly delusional DA who went gagga with his crap (and it ALL proved to be crap) but anyway that's MY two cents!

    As to all the people jumping up and down about us attacking the poor person who DARES to post such a thread... Click on my user name above. Go to TOPIC HISTORY go back a few pages and see where a few months back (or maybe years time does fly) I started a thread about this MYSELF! I had watched the movie and had many of the same concerns came on here and asked for opinions got directed to some different research did some research MYSELF and said "I was wrong" no one attacked me no one called me names but I was willing to look and admit I was wrong most conspiracy theroist are like JW there is no reasoning with them!

    This to me is the three things that I learned from LEAVING the Borg!

    1. NEVER BE AFRAID TO QUESTION YOUR OWN BELIEFS
    2. IF YOUR ARE WRONG, ADMIT YOU ARE WRONG!
    3. NEVER CAVE IF YOU ARE RIGHT!
  • free2beme
    free2beme

    As much as some people hate these subjects, I can honestly say they are fun subject to talk about. I would rather speak about these any day, over some of the boring news events that make headlines today. As they are overdone and boring as hell. I think it is a window into the soul too, to see the anger these subject can cause. Especially when most see them as clean fun.

  • Justice-One
    Justice-One

    The reason I keep harping on that small rifle scope is the fact that a small scope has a very small field of view. Now considering that rifles do tend to recoil, not to mention that he had to work the bolt, you are going to lose sight of the target as the rifle fires. The small scope is going to make it very hard to re-acquire the target. But Oswald supposedly brought the rifle down out of recoil, worked the bolt, and instantly found the moving target....three times in a row!

    Plus nobody has said anything about why this GREAT shot would use a piece of crap rifle like the Carcano...a rifle your lucky doesn't blow up in your face with the first shot.

    And lets not forget all the eye witness accounts the Warren Commission ignored. There was even some military men that were willing to SWEAR that bullets passed by them from the Grassy Knol. And I can tell you from personal experience that a rifle bullet passing by your ear is hard to mistake. It makes a CRACK not bang, as the super-sonic wave passes you.

  • Twitch
    Twitch

    Anyone hear of a connection between CT Russell and the Illuminati?

    Just wondering,.....;-)

  • free2beme
    free2beme
    Plus nobody has said anything about why this GREAT shot would use a piece of crap rifle like the Carcano...a rifle your lucky doesn't blow up in your face with the first shot.

    Didn't I read some where that when they test fired that rifle it fell apart? Anyone, my spouse and I own several weapons and shot them all the time. I can tell you from first hand knowledge, that I do not think he could have done what was said, unless he had some heavenly source pulling that trigger.

  • plmkrzy
    plmkrzy
    Bizzybee
    plmkrzy: no I hate conspiracy theories and do not buy into them
    As a fairly neutral observer, I find it interesting that
    • so many people have such strong reactions to conspiracy musings - verbally attacking the poor soul who dares to speculate
    • your reaction reveals much about who you are - your 'hot buttons'

    • LOL! Tried to post yesterday but couldn't get past the error page. I had to laugh because you quoted the wrong person in your post.
    • plm
  • Justice-One
    Justice-One
    my spouse and I own several weapons and shot them all the time.

    And I'm by no means an expert, (though I can put a round in a fleas ass at two hundred meters) but given the fact that my Dad was a rifle instructor in WW2, and that I have been shooting since I was two, I'm a Range Officer, and have shot in competition, AND that I have hung out with some FANTASTIC shots in my life, I think I might at least know some of the right questions to ask.

  • Navigator
    Navigator

    Re the Airliner hitting the Pentagon:

    A recent video making the rounds on the internet show a MacDonnald F-4 Phantom Jet being run into a concrete barrier at 500+ miles per hour. The airplane is effectively "vaporized". Virtually the entire mass of the airplane is converted to energy. This is shown "frame by frame". Those familiar with the Pentagon know that it is constructed "hell for stout" and is easily the equivalent of the concrete wall used in the test. The explanation for no airliner being found lies not in conspiracy theories, but in the formula (E=mc squared).

    I very much doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman in the Kennedy Assination. His prime function appears to have been "patsy". Kennedy was about to bring the Vietnam debacle to a close and that would be very costly to the Military Industrial complex. His assination turned out to be very profitable for a great many people involved in military arms production.

  • plmkrzy
    plmkrzy

    Wasn?t Oswald the worst shot in his battalion? I remember reading that somewhere but don?t know how true it is. Personally I agree with the patsy opinion. He was used for the purpose of having someone to hang for the crime. I doubt he killed Kennedy.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit