Pissedoff said: Why was David not stoned, under the law? He was King, and he was powerful. He did not even bring his sin to Nathan; he had to be confronted. The WT will state that his heart "must have been right"..... David's sin actually meets most people's definition of gross sin; an adult stealing another's mate, having him killed and covering the whole thing up. How does this compare to a young person fumbling about with his/her first sexual experience, or smoking a few cigarettes??
This is so true PO. I always thought there was something wrong with this whole thing. It's not like David voluntarily came forth and admitted what he had done. It had to be forced out of him. Even if he was sorry, that should not have prevented him from being stoned to death. Under the Mosaic Law, even the accidental death of someone forced the person to flee to the City of Refuge; otherwise they had to pay with their own life. What David did was not accidental. It was cold, calculated and planned. In the WT studies, it always tries to minimize what David did by emphasizing how "sorry" he was. (maybe he was just sorry that he got caught?)
I remember a few years ago, the WT study said that one young brother committed suicide after committing fornication for the first time. Instead of taking the blame for making this poor kid feel guilty to the point where he took his own life, they instead basically said "See what can happen if you do something natural?"
So, while they excuse David instead of just saying it's good to be king, they punish our young ones for what is often just stupid teenager behavior.
Exactly. And they wonder why so many young ones are leaving.