Z,
I have read your linked websites.
I have read the blog which you linked which rails in technicolor at BBC reportage over a number of issues. The problem is that as far as I could see no actual evidence is presented that proves a bias in BBC reportage towards Islam and away from Judaism and Christianity. I feel that you need to take time to offer your own evidence 'Z' and not just post links, then we can deal with actual verifiable fact and not mere opinion. I am open to persuation, but you will need to present far more that raging Conservatives looking for a fight with the BBC to give credibility to your view that the BBC is biased agianst the Jews and Christians.
For example, I was very amused that so much weight was being placed in the opinions of Jonathan Aitken, a right wing Conservative politician, who was disgraced and convicted of perjury and jailed for eighteen months. The irony is that it was not the BBC but ITN that incovered his shady dealings with the Saudis.
Far more valuable a comment comes imho from Andrew Marr, the BBC's political editor :
"We get from time to time people saying you're biased in favour of the Labour Party. Every time I ask people - show me a case of that bias, explain to me where we got it wrong and why what we said was so unfair - they seem to be unable to do so", Andrew Marr, May 11th 2001.
The second link that you posted is taking issue not with the BBC's reportage but with ITN, one of the BBC's main competitors.
The third link that you posted does not contain any reference to BBC reportage as far as I can see after a careful read. Did you actually read the report? It was aimed, not at the BBC, but at some of the UK newspapers.
Best regards - HS