Thought I'd try a different approach to the big questions but it'll probably descend into the usual disagreements. Still, no harm in trying . . .
The rules:
[1] No cut & paste. Post your own thoughts or don't post.
[2] Keep it short. If you can't make your point in 300 words or less you probably just can't make your point.
[3] Stay on topic.
Okay then, God.
Either he exists or he doesn't. To my knowledge, no-one has ever put forward an explanation as to how God came into existence. Claiming that he is 'eternal' is not an argument, just an assertion and an unsupportable one at that. Inferring his existence from the appearance of design in the natural world offers absolutely no insight into the matter of god's own existence.
Explain to me how God came to be and you will have gone some way to persuading me that the Universe was created. If I am convinced there is a Creator I'd be a fool to suppose that there is no 'Creation'. On the other hand, the lack of a satisfying explanation for God's origins must surely bring to the most religious mind the alternatives of natural selection as the explanation for the origins of life.
For that is the nub of the issue - original life.
Was original life the simplest, humblest, single celled microbe or was it the grandest, most complex, all powerful intelligence that has ever existed? Does life become more complex over billions of years in the manner of a small seed maturing into a wonderful sequoia or did life start at it's peak and only ever produce inferior varieties thereafter?
"In the beginning . . . . ?"