WATCHTOWER beginnings: the neurotic/erotic leader: C.T.Russell

by Terry 15 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • Terry
    Terry

    Every movement in society, politics or religion begins with the personality and drive of one charismatic man (or woman.)

    Here is a recap of the birth and transformation of the person and personalities creating the religion now known as Jehovah's Witnesses.

    1.Russell's mother was a Scottish Presbyterian who filled young Charles' head with fear of hell. Being intelligent and sensitive, it electrified his very being with an intellectual struggle to grasp why a loving God would kill him!

    2.Russell's dad was a successful businessman who gave him a unique sense of responsibility. He learned how to make an organization flourish. Russell was tutored, educated and driven by a sense of personal mission and purpose early in life.

    3.Russell had a crisis of faith at an early age due to the "harsh" judgements of mainstream religion. (My theory is that Russell probably had illicit sex and suffered a profound sense of guilt about it. He personally vowed he would never do it again if God would forgive him. Remember, this is my crackpot theory!)

    4.Russell listens to an explication of End Times which tickles his sense of how very soon the end of the ages might come. He invites the speaker to personally instruct him. On the basis of charts, graphs and dispensation theology, Russell moves to throw himself into making this known to everybody by becoming a writer/publisher. (Remember my theory? I think Russell was compensating for his sexual guilt hang-ups and sublimating.)

    5.Due to his personal talent for self-expression, Russell (like William Miller before him) becomes the center of attention in his writings about End Times.

    6.Russell's access to personal wealth (men's clothing stores) enables his pet projects.

    7.Russell surveys all the crackpot theories of his time (of which there were a considerable number!). He picks and chooses what appeals to his own personal tastes and combines them into a Pet Theory (no, not a theory about pets!).

    8.The cork in the crackpot bottle is the Great Pyramid of Giza. C.T.Russell finds the correspondency between other End Time predictions and the Great Pyramid measurements (which purport to demonstrate God's hidden time chart of prophecy) too perfectly self-supporting to ignore.

    9.Russell takes the bull by the horns. He shakes off all association with other writers (from whom he got his framgmentary ideas and theories) and creates his own personal version of End Times theory and publishes these ideas with the help of easily persuaded associates.

    10.A movement grows up around Russell's teachings and writings.

    STOP!

    At some point (I don't know exactly where) a personality change came over C.T.Russell. He found himself at the center of something very powerful which included being admired, listened to, beseeched for answers and praised for his "special" role in warning mankind (noble cause!) about the End just ahead.

    A pivotal relationship with Maria, his wife, is one of the most essential ingredients in what was to follow!

    I have no doubt Charles Taze Russell had sexual feelings. He was human, after all! But, I personally think he was neurotically afflicted about these feelings. Because of his mother's influence on him (and Scottish Presbyterian bugaboos about the evil of sexuality) Russell entered the "marriage" with a weird and perverse "prenuptial agreement" never to have physical relations with Maria.

    Maria was clearly C.T. Russell's intellectual equal. Her writings and self-expression were extraordinarily gifted, poetic, well-informed and equally crackpot! That Russell viewed Maria as an important helpmeet is obvious.

    However.......

    There would eventually be a few sources of conflict between them. I am pretty much convinced these conflicts were due to C.T. Russell's now distorted views about sex and his compulsions. We need not speculate. Conflict is conflict.

    The important (very important!) contribution of wife Maria was DOCTRINAL!

    It was Maria herself who invented the now famous (and startling) interpretation of the phrase "Faithful and Discreet Slave". (Faithful and Wise Servant in 1800's parlance.)

    Maria identified C.T. Russell as the antitypical fulfillment. Moreover, she felt that she (Maria) was one flesh with this prophetic fulfillment which made HER (Maria) ALSO the faithful and discreet slave!! (More theorizing here: I'm quite convinced Maria was able to get Charley to have sex at least once in order to fulfill the bible's admonition to "become one flesh" and make the marriage legal.) Otherwise, Russell could deny she was one flesh with him and not part of the faithful and discreet slave definition.

    It has been written and claimed that Charles Taze Russell denied he was such an important prophetic figure. Maybe, at first. But, the throngs of admirers, listeners, beseechers of wisdom who adulated Russell eventually penetrated his sense of ego and self-importance and he would privately admit he was, indeed, this prophetic fulfillment of "faithful and discreet slave."

    (I might add a point here. It was a novel interpretation which made this casual metaphor by Jesus into a prophetic importance in the first place! This is now the CENTRAL DOCTRINE of Jehovah's Witnesses reshaped and distorted over the years. It creates a magisterium for the Watchtower as central authority. It apes the Catholic doctrine of magisterium: to wit, only the church can interpret accurately what the true intent of scripture and prophecy is.)

    Whatever followed, the WTS sprung from 3 main facts.

    1.Russell was driven to relieve his personal anxiety about hell and punishment by inventing his own plausible theology which eventually became entirely contrarian and novel.

    2.The WTS became a launching pad for crackpot explanations of End Times musings largely "proved" by a jerry-rigged chart (not at all different from the hundreds of such charts already being used by religious groups which sprung from William Miller's movement.) combined with a Great Pyramid theory dovetailing in concrete theology.

    3.The "proof" of accuracy of Russell's theories combined these charts, graphs and unique interpretations into a personal mystique of being personally chosen by Christ.(Faithful and Discreet Slave) Maria sought to share this limelight. She would endure Russell's eccentricities (and coldness in the bedroom) if he allowed her equal measure of admiration and authorship which he refused. The marriage ended and Russell's personal woes commenced.

    All the above is ground zero historically for what followed.

    Just as Miller and his movement stimulated hysterical interest in Last Days and Return of Christ fanaticisms; so too Russell's terminated again and again in disappointment. (Great disappointment) Yet, each failure required adjustments and explanations and adaptations of what was presented previously as "GOD'S DATES, NOT OURS."

    Intellectual dishonesty is on two levels: private and public. Russell crossed both lines and levels!

    If C.T.Russell had not believed his own nonsense he would have allowed the non-happening of the non-rapture, non-Armageddon to disprove all his speculations. He would have folded his hands and published a retraction which clearly admitted failure and error. But, no True Believer can shatter his own absolute conviction of rightness.

    Russell began fudging dates, changing phrases, altering absolutes and recasting contexts in an effort to rescue his Grand Illusions as he struggled against accusations of infidelity, crooked business dealings and pettiness in dealing with his spouse.

    Those who had joined Russell's sideshow of creepy credulity included some talented and shrewd men who would control the destiny of this neo-religion after Russell died in 1916. Two men stand out among the rest: Fred Franz and J.F.Rutherford.

    Suffice to say the background of Russell's novel scheme and corporate manifestation of his neurotic preoccupations with End Times was too strong and lucrative to be allowed to die.

    The Russell/Millerite movement of colporteurs, book salesman and true believers split into two main groups (others would follow).

    The INTERNATIONAL BIBLE STUDENTS were the pure (non business oriented) followers who still exist to this day and only publish Studies in the Scriptures as their ministry. They have small meeting groups and utterly believe that C.T.Russell's early writings were accurate.

    The second half of the split was led by J.F.Rutherford whose posturing, ravings and machinations contorted the Russellites into becoming pawns in his international powerplay.

    What Jehovah's Witnesses largely are today is the result of J.F.Rutherford's madness and shrewd imagination.

  • minimus
    minimus

    Terry, What you've conjured up here is quite interesting. I'm surprised that you've expressed such unprovable comments regarding Russell being an erotic man who's mother gave him some sexual hangups. We all know that a lot of persons had religious crackpot views at that time. Nothing new here. I don't know that Russell was neurotic/erotic. I do think he was a man who tried to find "The Truth" but wound up believing that HE was God's chosen vessel, just like a lot of cult leaders.

  • lovelylil
    lovelylil

    Terry,

    What you wrote is so true in many ways. Russell was definately strange. Who gets married and vows not to have sex with their wife? You may very well be onto something and that is that Russell had some kind of sick guiltly feeling about sex. Also like you said, there were so many wierd teachings around during Russell's time, he merely picked a few he thought were acceptable to him. I tried to explain this to some BS friends of mine for years now. Especially that the pyramid linked to the Bible theories were written about by several other men way prior to Russell. Lastly, I love the statement you made that the illustration of the faithful servant by Jesus was not meant as literal, in that he was not appointing one one person (s) into that position. As a matter of fact, Jesus did not appoint anyone into any such position! He merely was asking when he returned who if anyone would he find being faithful in his teachings. If any where faithful upon his arrival they would be likened to "faithful servants". This is a big one though like you said that led the Bible Students and then the JW's really astray.

    Excellent points, I really enjoyed read them. Peace, Lilly

  • uninformed
    uninformed

    I enjoyed reading your thoughts. My take is that you are either exactly right or close. brant

  • onacruse
    onacruse

    Mr. Terry, though you know that I agree with you in more ways than I can count, I feel compelled to offer this thought:

    Is a subject such as this a fundamental delineation of a religious movement, based on principle and practices, or is it ad hominem?

    For example, we could post (and, for all I can remember, I have posted as well) about Rutherford's drinking problem. Does that constitute proof that the religion he established/led was inherently wrong?

    Don't take me wrong: For all I know, Russell was eccentric, and perhaps even bizarre...but, I never met the man, and even if I had, my opinion of him as a person, as a human, wouldn't mean didly other than insofar as I was willing to follow his lead (and therein would be my fault to begin with, not his).

    Respectfully,

    Craig

  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    Your theory will make a great book and movie after the movement fails. Hollywood
    has to sex up the story. It will never be known to be true, simply because
    CTR and society gave little credit to women, WTS continues that tradition.

  • Terry
    Terry
    I'm surprised that you've expressed such unprovable comments regarding Russell being an erotic man who's mother gave him some sexual hangups.

    Here is my map for speculating.

    1.C.T.Russell's first exposure to religion, God, a divine plan and attitudes about authority stem from his mother who was a Scottish Presbyterian.

    2.Scottish Presbyterian belief was staunchly contrarian in origins (against the Catholic authority). Among this church's distinguishing features was the prohibition against members voting or holding office in American politics because Jesus Christ was not acknowledged as Lord by the Constitution. Russell's mother, like many women of her time, would only be able to find self-expression in a male dominated society by force of her intellectual pursuit of religious philosophy and activity.

    3. In 1647, the British Parliment under the control of PURITANS embraced Presbyterianism. Puritan views of sex are notoriously neurotic and obsessed with cleanliness and self-perfection by abstention from passions of the flesh.

    4.C.T.Russell was clearly oddly affected by fears of Hellfire and the wrath of God for impurity. As a young man he scribbled scriptures on sidewalks to warn passersby of God's views on matters of purity.

    5.A man's core psychology motivates all his activity in life. Russell was keenly driven to explain and warn about a core cataclysm: the destruction of the WICKED at Armageddon.

    6.The most persuasive element in Russell's theology is the extreme preoccupation with creating God in the image of a reasonable, loving, accepting persona who would never burn anybody in Hell. This Jehovah of Russell's imagination merely wished to employ reasonably reverent christians as advertisers of his Divine Plan to usher in a reward for faithful activity. It would be the scoffers and deluded (mainly by mainstream religion, i.e. believers in hell; who would be destroyed at Armageddon.

    7.Russell's marriage was plain weird!

    8.What warm-blooded man would not share a bed with a willing and attractive wife? Only a neurotic and psychiatric disorder could produce the kind of platonic marriage Russell and Maria had. It is not much of a stretch to see Russell compensating for lack of sex by throwing himself into a sublimation of religious purification. His Puritan upbringing compelled him to self-perfect. This is the hallmark of Jehovah's Witnesses: they must constantly EARN THEIR REWARD and not merely accept free salvation by grace.

    9.Is it unreasonable to think Russell (who was handsome, rich and autonomous as well as charismatic in personality) would not AT LEAST ONCE indulge himself in a sexual experience???? (Look at Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, and a host of such men who are devout.)

    10. Guilt is a huge motivator.

    11.The susequent scandals involving Russell's "unusual" relationship with their household ward bespeaks personal longings and self-confliction.

    12.Nothing comes from nothing. The International Bible Students and Russell's vast detailed writings came from something; I call this something by name: SUBLIMATED SEXUAL POWER. Russell converted sexual frustration, guilt, fear into religious zeal.

    13.The chief feature of Russell's theology is that the REWARD WAS NEAR! (i.e. You didn't have to endure very long to get your reward. By being transformed at Armageddon the fleshly desires would vanish and not be a further bother or worry.)

    You think I'm being unreasonable?

    Remember, I called it my personal, crackpot theory!

  • Terry
    Terry

    Is a subject such as this a fundamental delineation of a religious movement, based on principle and practices, or is it ad hominem?

    For example, we could post (and, for all I can remember, I have posted as well) about Rutherford's drinking problem. Does that constitute proof that the religion he established/led was inherently wrong?

    If find that Great men have great appetites, great strengths come from great fear of great weaknesses. Intelligent people compensate for their weakness by driving powerfully in the opposite direction from the thing which chases them.

    Let us take Martin Luther as an example. The more you read about him just as a man, a person a thinking being; the more one is compelled to notice the conflicted anger, fear, rage and power of the forces driving him. Nobody takes on an edifice of such mammoth power as the Catholic Church without an equally mammoth psychology of ego and anger. What drives it? That is the source of my curiousity and speculation.

    Often, when we address the problem of this religion of Jehovah's Witnesses and the harm it has caused in our own lives we merely start at the point of a stipulated "given". We don't see the motor that drives us and drives it to coalesce into the disaster of absolute conviction.

    I personally had many empty holes in my psyche that the JW's filled in neatly. To wit: I needed a strong father figure which Jehovah filled. I was an only child and I obtained brothers and sisters at the Kingdom Hall. I was intelligent, but, not directed into a purposeful activity and outlet for my intellect which the preaching work satisfied. I needed approval. My success at bible studies, platform performance and public talks gave me the approval. I needed a rite of passage into manhood and enduring the two years in Federal Prison provided it in spades.

    This psychology of the core personality is behind everything in a profoundly hidden way unless we penetrate the shroud.

    My post attempts just that. Nothing more was intended.

  • Fatfreek
    Fatfreek

    Terry, I enjoyed your logic trail.

    Fats

  • minimus
    minimus

    Terry, thanks for your response. I see where you're coming from, however although CTR had a weird "marriage", your hypothesis doesn't mean much more than speculation. A lot of persons, esp. during that time had major (religious) sexual hangups. There ARE those that take vows of derpivation including sex. And some actually don't deviate. Your argument is built upon your view that it's unreasonable to think tht a normal sexual person might not engage in sex. While I agree that it's difficult and rare amongst the population, it does occur that people keep such vows. You say Russell converted sexual frustration into religious zeal. That is very unprovable and that statement might be considered a stretch too.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit