I need to get proof that the temple of solomon did fall in 586 BCE.
Please help.
Thanks
by Wafe 13 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
I need to get proof that the temple of solomon did fall in 586 BCE.
Please help.
Thanks
Hi
If you are trying to discuss this issue with a Witness, use Alleymom's brilliant approach in this thread:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/55372/1.ashx
It's a classic!
CyrusThePersian
Alleymom's thread is, indeed, brilliant. You might like to look here, also. I've met the author, an XJW, who is a really good guy.
Ian
Yes, also make sure to read what the great Olof has written in connection to 586. He is quite the supporter for that date. 586 that is.
Dear Wafe,
Alan Feuerbacher did a awesome paper on the subject, going paragraph by paragraph with the only book the Society will refer you to as "proof" for 607, and acknowledges the discrepancies between the dates. That book is the Kingdom Come book..in the Appendix. Alan does a refutation to it and it is AWESOME!! It will give you the many "proofs" you may need.
http://corior.blogspot.com/2006/02/refutation-of-appendix-in-let-your.html
I also agree with using Alleymoms KISS chart. Too you may want to visit the British Museum online.
Sincerely,
Lady Liberty
P.S. Here are some other things that may help you:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/110306/1.ashx
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/110306/1.ashx
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/115284/1.ashx
My personal story of leaving the Watchtower because of my 607 issue and what I discovered researching it:
Needproof, you may not like the Bible but some of us do.
Please refrain from insuling others beliefs.
insulting even
Sol-om-on is a breakup of the name given to the sun in the esoteric languages of the ancient world. Latin: Sol, Sanskrit: Om and on was the name given to the temple of the sun. SOL-OM-ON
Rofl. Try that again with "Solomon" in Hebrew: SHeLoMo.
Why is discussing another opinion of Christianity insulting?
And I didn't say that I do not like the Bible.