THE BIG SWINDLE

by Terry 20 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • Terry
    Terry
    http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/070323-sowell-swindle.php

    I try to give both sides of issues a fair read.

    All of you who have been convinced by scientific evidence that global warming has been caused by man and can be stopped by man should read the above.

    How about specific comments pertaining to the above for a change rather than simply policy wank rants??

    Global Warming Swindle

    Opinion Editorial by Thomas Sowell - Mar 23, 2007

    Britain’s Channel 4 has produced a devastating documentary titled “The Great Global Warming Swindle.” It has apparently not been broadcast by any of the networks in the United States. But, fortunately, it is available on the Internet.

    Distinguished scientists specializing in climate and climate-related fields talk in plain English and present readily understood graphs showing what a crock the current global warming hysteria is.

    These include scientists from MIT and top-tier universities in a number of countries. Some of these are scientists whose names were paraded on some of the global warming publications that are being promoted in the media — but who state plainly that they neither wrote those publications nor approved them.

    One scientist threatened to sue unless his name was removed.

    While the public has been led to believe that “all” the leading scientists buy the global warming hysteria and the political agenda that goes with it, in fact the official reports from the United Nations or the National Academy of Sciences are written by bureaucrats — and then garnished with the names of leading scientists who were “consulted,” but whose contrary conclusions have been ignored.

    There is no question that the globe is warming but it has warmed and cooled before, and is not as warm today as it was some centuries ago, before there were any automobiles and before there was as much burning of fossil fuels as today.

    None of the dire things predicted today happened then.

    The British documentary goes into some of the many factors that have caused the earth to warm and cool for centuries, including changes in activities on the sun, 93 million miles away and wholly beyond the jurisdiction of the Kyoto treaty.

    According to these climate scientists, human activities have very little effect on the climate, compared to many other factors, from volcanoes to clouds.

    These climate scientists likewise debunk the mathematical models that have been used to hype global warming hysteria, even though hard evidence stretching back over centuries contradicts these models.

    What is even scarier than seeing how easily the public, the media, and the politicians have been manipulated and stampeded, is discovering how much effort has been put into silencing scientists who dare to say that the emperor has no clothes.

    Academics who jump on the global warming bandwagon are far more likely to get big research grants than those who express doubts — and research is the lifeblood of an academic career at leading universities.

    Environmental movements around the world are committed to global warming hysteria and nowhere more so than on college and university campuses, where they can harass those who say otherwise. One of the scientists interviewed on the British documentary reported getting death threats.

    In politics, even conservative Republicans seem to have taken the view that, if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em. So have big corporations, which have joined the stampede.

    This only enables the green crusaders to declare at every opportunity that “everybody” believes the global warming scenario, except for a scattered few “deniers” who are likened to Holocaust deniers.

    The difference is that we have the hardest and most painful evidence that there was a Holocaust. But, for the global warming scenario that is causing such hysteria, we have only a movie made by a politician and mathematical models whose results change drastically when you change a few of the arbitrarily selected variables.

    No one denies that temperatures are about a degree warmer than they were a century ago.

    What the climate scientists in the British documentary deny is that you can mindlessly extrapolate that, or that we are headed for a climate catastrophe if we don't take drastic steps that could cause an economic catastrophe.

    “Global warming” is just the latest in a long line of hysterical crusades to which we seem to be increasingly susceptible.

    To find out more about the documentary:

    The Great Global Warming Swindle

    Thomas Sowell is a Senior Fellow at The Hoover Institution at Stanford University in California. He has published dozens of books on economics, education, race, and other topics. His most recent book is Black Rednecks and White Liberals, in which he argues that "internal" cultural habits of industriousness, thriftiness, family solidarity, and reverence for education often play a greater role in the success of ethnic minorities than do civil-rights laws or majority prejudices.

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    The earth was much warmer in the 14th century than it is now..There were no factorys or automobiles,just farting cows..LOL!!..Is the earth going through a warming cycle?..Are we adding to that warming cycle?..Do we have as many farting cows as they did in the 14th century?.....Personally,I blame farting cow`s..LOL!!...OUTLAW

  • Paralipomenon
    Paralipomenon

    I'm not sure what to think on this. Man was able to rip holes in the ozone layer with recklessness. I don't put global warming past their capabilities.

  • Clam
    Clam

    Interesting, as was the documentary. I can't say I buy the following though:

    Academics who jump on the global warming bandwagon are far more likely to get big research grants than those who express doubts — and research is the lifeblood of an academic career at leading universities.

    Surely the energy companies could pour fortunes into research which could reasonably counter the "global warming hysteria"? If it's then scientifically evaluated by neutrals with no agenda, then surely the arguement could be settled? What is implied, is that those with the cash and influence (the polluters) only rely on naysaying, in the face of an avalanche of hard scientific evidence.

  • Rabbit
    Rabbit

    I suppose I'm a Global Warming Agnostic.

    With...leanings toward a cleaner environment never hurts anybody's health.

    Rabbit

  • forsharry
    forsharry

    hmmm...

    I'm of the theory that it can't hurt to be a little more eco-conscious.

    legano, nil legano...is grey area.

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Quote:

    "These include scientists from MIT and top-tier universities in a number of countries. Some of these are scientists whose names were paraded on some of the global warming publications that are being promoted in the media — but who state plainly that they neither wrote those publications nor approved them.

    One scientist threatened to sue unless his name was removed."


    You tell me Terry, how does one go about giving "specific comments" about claims so incredibly...., well, non-specific? And in fact, your entire article was rather non-specific, wasn't it? In fact, I think it would qualify more as a policy wonk rant than a reasoned debate about global warming.

    Oh wait, I see, you want specific comments on the TV show you posted about previously. Well....

    Kudra, in your other thread about this same subject, gave you a few fairly specific criticisms of this "documentary" you've glommed onto, and if memory serves, you ignored her. Why? Don't you think you have much to learn from Kudra wrt global warming (and scientific research, for that matter), Terry?

    You left us with an article by one Thomas Sowell. What specifically has Sowell said wrt global warming facts (and by "facts" I mean as opposed to the conjecture and opinion and side-taking found in this article) that has convinced you he's an expert to be listened to?

    While neither is a climate researcher per se, in your opinion Terry, is Thomas Sowell a more, less, or equally credible voice on global warming than physicist Stephen Hawking?

    btw, I know I've seen comments by at least one scientist (Carl Wunsch) whose comments in the "documentary" swindle you seem so enchanted by were edited to mean something opposite of the point he was making:

    Quote:

    "In a letter written by Wunsch on March 15, 2007, he said that he believed in climate change and thought it "almost certainly has a major human-induced component". He also says he had thought he was contributing to a programme which sought to counterbalance "over-dramatisation and unwarranted extrapolation of scientific facts". He raised objections as to how his interview material was used:

    "In the part of The Great Climate Change Swindle where I am describing the fact that the ocean tends to expel carbon dioxide where it is warm, and to absorb it where it is cold, my intent was to explain that warming the ocean could be dangerous - because it is such a gigantic reservoir of carbon. By its placement in the film, it appears that I am saying that since carbon dioxide exists in the ocean in such large quantities, human influence must not be very important—diametrically opposite to the point I was making—which is that global warming is both real and threatening." [4]"

    Hey, isn't that cute, I was specific! Bless my little heart! A name and everything! I tell you what, that specific stuff is exhausting! I can see why so few people do it, and even when they do, they don't keep doing it thru an entire debate. Afterall, an intellectually lazy, dishonest debater could beat a person to death with request for a level of accuracy and specificity that he himself would never meet.

    I'm just glad our common history with the dishonest researchers and writers and leaders of the Watchtower society has made JWD a place of scrupulous honesty.

    Sadly, that last was sarcasm.

  • heathen
    heathen

    I believe that after having watched Jon Stewart last night that Al Gore sounds like an idiot ............ either way you look at it if mankind wants to remain on this planet in the future we will have to stop poluting it .

  • Clam
    Clam

    "Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice."

    ---Will Durant (1885 - 1981)

  • bernadette
    bernadette

    todays Guardian newspaper has this article

    Pill stops cow burps and helps save the planet

    Kate Connolly in Berlin
    Friday March 23, 2007
    The Guardian

    Cut down on flying, sell the car and recycle your bottles. But if you really want to tackle global warming, you should stop your cow from burping.

    According to scientific estimates, the methane gas produced by cows is responsible for 4% of greenhouse gas emissions. And now, German scientists have invented a pill to cut bovine burping.

    The fist-sized plant-based pill, known as a bolus, combined with a special diet and strict feeding times, is meant to reduce the methane produced by cows.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit