BUSH ADMINISTRATION BLOCKS CHEAPER DRUG IMPORTS---BIG SURPRISE

by Mary 26 Replies latest social current

  • Mary
    Mary
    Highlander said: I'm waiting for my wife to get full time status at her job so that she can get benefits for both of us. But that can only last so long if she were to get pregnant and then we'd be back to square one again.

    Um.....I don't understand this part.....you mean if your wife gets pregnant you don't get health insurance from her employer?!

    I've already decided that if I or my wife were to require surgery, we would do a vacation surgery in her country of origin,,, There we can pay cash or charge any medical operations that we may need. That is how messed up it is here in the states. I have personally met people that have had medical procedures done overseas in India. It's getting to be a common thing for US citizens to do nowadays.

    A couple of years ago, I met an anesthesiologist who was originally from Canada but now living in the States. When I asked him why he moved, he unashamedly admitted "for the money." He was "only making" about $400,000/year practicing in Canada, whereas living in the States, he was making over $2,000,000. Poor bastard. Imagine having to scrape by on a measley $400,000 a year. While having his salary quadruple was great for him, it comes with a hefty price tag: his astronomical fees have to be paid for by either an insurance company which drives up premiums, or by the poor sap who makes an average or below average wage who can barely afford it. Greedy bastard.

  • Brother Apostate
  • carla
    carla

    Mary,

    In the US most companies to not offer health insurance at all to part time employees. Some do not offer insurance if one becomes pregnant, others give you the option of requesting that if you are of child bearing age. There are very few (if any anymore?) companies that pay 100% of health insurance. If you are self employed (own your own small company) you are really screwed. Usually small business owners have only major medical, meaning catastrophic only. No visits to doctors are covered, no meds, no dental, no vision. Most employees are unaware how much the company picks up for their employees. For each employee it can cost thousands each year. I think health insurance supplied to the employee should be seen and considered income. I think people would see how much their employers really are paying.

    I have a family member that works for a company that only charges the employees a ridiculously low monthly cost for insurance. They had a 100% drug coverage. When the company wanted the employees to co-pay 15.00 for each med they went throught the roof!! As a small business owner myself with nearly no insurance I really could not sympathize with them at all.

    In my opinion the fastest way to fix the health problem in the US would be to stop paying for all the politicians health care (does that go on for their lifetime? I think yes) Start with them and the entire system would be fixed pronto. I think they get 100% coverage of everything including meds. At no cost to them.

  • juni
    juni

    My blood pressure is rising fast!!

    This issue has to be addressed. Our insurance costs are criminal and the coverage stinks to put it mildly.

    I believe you can order prescriptions drugs online. You have to have your doctor FAX the prescription to a legit pharmacy in Canada so it can be filled.

    My daughter went on line and ordered Zyrtec I believe it is (for allergy relief) which here in the US is a prescription drug and in Canada is over the counter. She is saving hundreds of $.

    I feel they have to do away with these damn lobbyists who have the government in their hands. One hand washes the other so to speak.

    We need a change with our health industry ASAP.

    Juni

  • needproof
    needproof

    Is there ANYBODY out there who is happy with what Bush is doing to America? How can this guy win 2 elections? We know he stole the first election, did he steal the second?

  • Mary
    Mary
    carla said: In the US most companies to not offer health insurance at all to part time employees. Some do not offer insurance if one becomes pregnant, others give you the option of requesting that if you are of child bearing age.

    Holy shit! That would be illegal in Canada. While we have our publically funded health care system, companies generally offer "extended health care" that covers stuff that the general pot doesn't, like chiropracter, prescription meds (unless you make under $30,000 a year or are 65 or older----then your prescription drugs are free after a $100.00/year deductable), dental, massage therapy, etc. If you were working at a company and became pregnant and they tried taking your benefits away, you could sue their asses off for discrimination.

    needproof asked: Is there ANYBODY out there who is happy with what Bush is doing to America?

    Why yes. I'm assuming that those who have a giant stake in the drug companies, those who own oil and gas companies and those with the military contracts are probably most happy with what this asshole has done to line their pockets. Apparently if Hillary Clinton gets elected (which I'm betting she will), she and Bill will try to get the healthcare system reformed which will result in one of the following:

    1) alot of happy consumers and pissed off drug companies which would result in:

    2) an assassination of Hillary Clinton or an attempt to destroy her politically

    Whenever you go up against the rich and powerful in the USA, there is a severe backlash. JFK was attempting to reign in not only the military and the oil men, but the major banks and the large steel companies who held government contracts. These groups were all gouging the public and making record breaking profits on the backs of the working class and Kennedy wanted to put a stop to that. He ended up dead.

    Unfortunately, with one group scratching the others' backs, the only way you're going to see a reformed health care system in the States is if people riot.

    How can this guy win 2 elections? We know he stole the first election, did he steal the second?

    No, but John Kerry was so piss poor weak it wasn't funny. Had Bush been running against Clinton, there's no way Bush would have ever been elected for a second term. He is, in many people's opinion, the worst president the States has ever had.

  • Tuesday
    Tuesday
    Is there ANYBODY out there who is happy with what Bush is doing to America? How can this guy win 2 elections? We know he stole the first election, did he steal the second?

    Yes he did:

    check out www.whatreallyhappened.org

  • needproof
    needproof

    If only the people of the U.S (and here in the UK) were not so docile. I mean, what has all this got to do with football? Why should your celeb-hunting friends-watching CNN loving Joe Average give a damn? Unfortunately, our nations have been dumbed down.

  • rebel8
    rebel8

    Bush is a dishonest piece of work.

    This dishonesty plays out in many of his little projects. Just change a few words in the thread title and you can explain a lot of things he does.

    BUSH ADMINISTRATION BLOCKS BILLION DOLLAR MONETARY SETTLEMENTS FROM TOBACCO INDUSTRY & FIRES DOJ STAFF WHO DISAGREE---BIG SURPRISE
    BUSH ADMINISTRATION BLOCKS INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO TREATY THAT WOULD SAVE MILLIONS OF LIVES---BIG SURPRISE
    BUSH ADMINISTRATION BLOCKS CHEAPER GAS PRICES---BIG SURPRISE
    BUSH ADMINISTRATION BLOCKS QUASH ON MILITARY SPENDING---BIG SURPRISE

  • seawolf
    seawolf

    Don't forget the FDA..they're all nothing but a bunch of crooks and liars. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ is all they care about. Watch this and you'll get just the tip of the iceberg. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS3mhjt7TrY

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit