MAJOR UN/WTS NEWS- UN LETTER & 1992 Press R...

by hawkaw 589 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • MadApostate
    MadApostate

    Those of you searching the web for pertinent material: How any times have you passed over this webpage thinking it to have little significance? I have numerous times, until now.

    Where have we just seen ALAIN GARAY and WILLY FAUTRE mentioned? At this Poland conference, GARAY shares the stage with CAROLYN WAH while presenting a workshop called "The Role of Inter-Governmental Organizations". FAUTRE proceeds them, with Jeremy Gunn of OSCE/CSCE fame listed in 2 roles.

    the PROTECTION of RELIGIOUS
    MINORITIES: religious freedom & human rights in post-communist europe

    MARCH 16 - 18, 1998

    LOCATION:

    conference center
    wawel castel 5
    krakow, POLAND
    (48-12) 422-5155 / 422-1950

    monday, march 16

    ...
    ...

    SESSION I: PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS MINORITIES

    ...
    ...

    EMIL COHEN, Presenter

    Tolerance Foundation, Sofia

    The Discrimination policy towards the So-Called Sects in Bulgaria: The Case of the Jehovah's Witnesses

    ...
    ...

    tuesday, march 17

    SESSION III: RELIGIOUS MINORITIES AND TRANSNATIONAL ACTORS

    9:00-10:45 Plenary Address: Untangling the Web: External Monitoring and the International Protection of Freedom of Religion and Belief

    PETER DANCHIN, Speaker
    Columbia University School of Law

    WILLY FAUTRE, Respondent
    Human Rights Without Frontiers, Brussels


    JEREMY GUNN, Chair
    JFK Review Board

    10:45-12:00 Workshop One: The Role of Inter-Governmental Organizations

    JOHAN VAN DER VYVER, Chair
    Emory University Law School

    ALAIN GARAY, Presenter

    Court of Appeals of Paris

    The Judicial Precedents of the European Court of Human Rights and Religious Freedom

    CAROLYN WAH, Presenter

    Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York

    European Parliamentary Enquete Commissions - Justification of a Two-Tiered System of Religious Freedoms

    JEREMY GUNN, Presenter
    JFK Review Board

    Protection of Religious Minorities and the OSCE

    ------------------------------------------------------

    . http://www.uj.edu.pl/confer/columbia98/program.html

  • MadApostate
    MadApostate

    It seems that WATCHTOWER LEGAL not only likes to use politicians to help them meet their corporate goals, but they also are not beyond appealing to the teachings and philosophy of false religion to help them out.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    THE TEACHINGS OF CONFUCIUS: A BASIS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR ALTERNATIVE NON-MILITARY CIVILIAN SERVICE

    Carolyn R. Wah*

    Over the centuries the teachings of Confucius have been quoted and misquoted to support a wide variety of opinions and social programs ranging from the suppression and sale of women to the concerted suicide of government ministers discontented with the incoming dynasty. Confucius's critics have asserted that his teachings encourage passivity and adherence to rites with repression of individuality and independent thinking.1

    The case is not that simple. A careful review of Confucius's expressions as preserved by Mencius, his student, and the expressions of those who have studied his teachings, suggests that Confucius might have found many of the expressions and opinions attributed to him to be objectionable and inconsistent with his stated opinions. In part, this misunderstanding of Confucius and his position on individuality, and the individual's right to take a stand in opposition to legitimate authority, results from a distortion of two Confucian principles; namely, the principle of legitimacy of virtue, suggesting that the most virtuous man should rule, and the principle of using the past to teach the present.2 Certainly, even casual study reveals that Confucius sought political stability, but he did not discourage individuality or independent action. Thus, while he was in favor of harmony, Confucius did not advocate conformity and blind obedience.

    This article takes the central theme that Confucius' teachings support the individual's natural and inherent right and responsibility to exercise his conscience and have such right protected by governmental authority. The paper is divided into four parts. After a brief discussion of Confucius, his family, personal background, and the political conditions in which he lived, the article will discuss the major themes in Confucius' philosophy and addresses some of the more controversial issues as they withstood the test of time.

    Part II discusses how Confucius' fundamental teachings on the five relationships, and the individual's relationship to legitimate authority have been used, misused, attacked and distorted over the centuries. Part III investigates three specific applications of Confucius' teachings that demonstrate that the thesis presented in the paper; namely, that Confucius' teachings support the individual's natural and inherent right and responsibility to oppose legitimate governmental authority when the governmental authority is out of harmony with the moral sense of the individual, is well-supported. Finally, Part IV investigates the recent Taiwan legislation and the application of Confucian thought to freedom of conscience and the question of participation in non-military service when the applicant holds strong religious or morally founded objections to service. It concludes with the suggestion that such legislation should be considered in Korea and all other Asian countries with strong Confucian traditions. This discussion is conducted keeping in mind the principle that Confucianism, like the world's other great philosophical legal and religious traditions, is neither static nor monolithic, but is a gradually maturing tradition.

    Click here for the rest of this lengthy document:

    . http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/wah.htm

  • Trilobite
    Trilobite

    Mad,

    My hat is off to you. Even a hardened apostate such as myself is genuinely shocked at the events of the past few weeks. And now, to invoke Confucius to support non-military alternatives to military service, considering that this was banned until recently, is almost beyond belief.

    Thus, while he was in favor of harmony, Confucius did not advocate conformity and blind obedience.
    Mad, tell me you are making this up - this from WTS legal?

    My exercise prgram has gone to hell lately and I can only blame you and hawk and the rest of yr ilk. Give it a rest, I need a life....

    T.

  • MadApostate
    MadApostate

    INTERFAITH MEETING WITH PRESS

    CESNUR excerpt:

    Not long time ago, a Latvian daily newspaper "Jauna Avize" came forth with the following question: "Can we automatically count the traditional as positive, and the new as negative?" The editors invited the representatives of both the traditional confessions and NRMs to take part in a round table discussion. However, the leaders of the so called traditional religions, namely, of the Latvian Lutheran Church, the Union of the Baptist Congregations, and the Roman Catholic Riga Curia stood aloof, with the pretext that they had nothing to do with 'these sects'.

    Among the discussants were JWs, Christian Science, New Apostolic Church, and the ISKCON (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness). The journalist commented that there were no theological conflicts and that the 'innovators' expressed their willingness to come together more often in the future to try to work together and to pray for the sake of Latvia. The newspaper concluded: ".. thus, the traditionalists are only interested in their own followers."

  • Alleymom
    Alleymom

    Hi --

    I am new to this board and have been following the UN news with great interest.

    Here is another article from the Guardian by Stephen Bates from Monday, October 15. The title is 'Hypocrite' Jehovah's Witnesses abandon secret link with UN.

    If someone has already posted this, my apologies.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4277197,00.html

    "alleymom"

  • Alleymom
    Alleymom

    Here is the text of the article from The Guardian:

    ‘Hypocrite’ Jehovah’s Witnesses abandon secret link with UN

    Stephen Bates, religious affairs correspondent
    Guardian
    Monday October 15, 2001

    The Jehovah’s Witnesses have hurriedly disaffiliated from the United Nations within days of a Guardian story in which
    members accused the sect of hypocrisy for supporting an organisation it has repeatedly denounced privately.
    After the article last Monday, the organisation’s New York based hierarchy pre-empted a UN inquiry by agreeing to
    dissociate the Witnesses from an organisation which it holds to be the scarlet beast named in the Book of Revelation.

    The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, as the sect is formally known, has 6m members
    worldwide and 130,000 in Britain. It had been secretly affiliated to the UN as a non-governmental organisation
    for 10 years.

    Recognised organisations are supposed to demonstrate that they share the UN’s objectives, but Witnesses are instead told by elders to regard it as “a disgusting thing in the sight of God and his people” for allegedly aspiring to world domination like Babylon the Great, the beast in Revelation.

    The sect does not believe in participating in government and initially strove to play down or deny the evidence of the UN’s website, which lists it as one of 1,500 affiliated NGOs.

    Those bringing the evidence to light were accused of apostacy. Disaffiliated members become known informally, like
    the rest of humanity, as “bird seed” in line with biblical prophesy of the fate of non-believers, whose corpses will be
    pecked bare by crows.

    Within hours of the article’s appearance on the Guardian website on Monday and its posting on a Jehovah’s Witnesses
    bulletin board, more than 14,000 people across the world had read it. By yesterday there were 353 official posts and 325 message boards discussing the article and its revelations, with Witnesses in the US demanding to see copies of the paper.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4277197,00.html

  • MadApostate
    MadApostate

    Everyone is familiar with the WTS's efforts over the past 15 years or so of getting as much PR as possible out of the Nazi Concentration Camp tragedies suffered by JWs.

    Well, it appears that their efforts have finally paid off, literally for the victims, and PR-wise for the WTS.

    Here is another example of how those who "are no part of the world" have actually woven their way into the international community.

    I am posting this "invitation" since it includes pertinent "political" background info.

    The WTS "connection" will be posted in a separate post.

    -------------------------------------------------

    INVITATION OF PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

    Vilnius, 2 June 2000

    Dear Prime Minister,

    I have the honour to inform you that on 4 - 5 October 2000 Vilnius will host The International Forum on Holocaust Era Looted Cultural Assets which will be held under the auspices of Secretary General of the Council of Europe.

    The Vilnius Forum is organised as a follow up event in the spirit of the 1998 Washington Forum on Holocaust Era Assets and the 2000 Stockholm International Conference on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research. The Forum is expected to implement Resolution No.1205 (1999) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which called for an European conference to discuss restitution of looted cultural assets. The objectives of the Forum are to discuss a possible inventory of the looted cultural assets as well as establishing legal provisions for restitution of cultural property and to share national experience in this field. I believe that it would be expedient to set up a Task Force on the Holocaust Era Looted Cultural Assets to assure the follow up of the Vilnius Forum. This group should include members delegated by countries, which have both interest and expertise in the field.

    I hope you will agree that the restoration of Holocaust Era Looted Assets requires special attention after a protracted period of negligence and may I therefore count on participation of the delegation including the representatives of non-governmental organisations in Vilnius Forum. We also intend to invite representatives from all the Member States of the Council of Europe, USA and Israel.

    Availing myself of this opportunity, I would like to extend to Your Excellency the assurances of my highest consideration.

    Andrius Kubilius

    ******************************************************
    EDIT: I found this little item regarding Holocaust $$$, and will post here, rather than separate, since really not germane to this thread:

    D. PROPOSAL FROM JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES ORGANIZATION WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA

    Address: 100 Watchtower Drive, Patterson, NY 12563; Tel No: 914-306-0700

    Contact: Carolyn R. Wah, Associate General Counsel

    Date of Proposal: December 7, 1999; as supplemented August 23, 2000; on August 10, 1999 and on June 22, 2000 the Special Master met with Carolyn R. Wah, Jolene Chu and James Pellechia.

    Proposal Summary: Special consideration should be given to applications of the surviving
    Jehovah's Witness victims of Nazi persecution. The Watch Tower would use a portion of the Settlement Fund to support its ongoing research and archival work on the Holocaust and presentations of its findings. It would devote any allocated monies solely to Holocaust education and the remembrance of the prisoners who bore the purple triangle, which represented the

    In Re HOLOCAUST VICTIM ASSETS LITIGATION (Swiss Banks) SPECIAL MASTER'S PROPOSAL, September 11, 2000
    Jehovah's Witnesses. Watch Tower proposes to establish a legal entity to make cash payments
    and in-kind distributions to needy Jehovah's Witness class members,

  • MadApostate
    MadApostate

    The Cost of Spiritual Resistance: Jehovah's Witnesses During the Nazi Era

    James N. Pellechia,

    Associate Editor of Watch Tower Publications and Director of Public Affairs Office, Watch Tower Society

    Mr. Chairman Emanuelis Zingeris, Mr. President Valdas Adamkus, Mr. Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius, Mr. President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Lord Russell-Johnston, Mr. Secretary General of the Council of Europe Walter Schwimmer, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury of the United States Mr. Stuart Eizenstat, honored colleagues, on behalf of the Watch Tower Society and Jehovah's Witness victims of Nazi persecution, I am pleased and deeply honored to address this important gathering We have observed with interest the energetic efforts by many of you present here in working for a fair and equitable settlement of difficult issues. The progress since the conferences in Washington and London has been remarkable, thanks to your committed work.

    This conference marks the first time that Jehovah's Witnesses have been formally invited to participate in discussions regarding losses sustained during the Nazi era. My brief remarks will be a presentation of diminutives. The victim group is small; therefore, in monetary terms their losses were correspondingly small. Scholarly research is scanty, having begun in earnest only in the last few years; therefore, substantive data on looted cultural assets is practically non-existent. Restitution for the victims has been sporadic at best, completely denied at worst (1). In short, little has been done; therefore, there is little to say.

    Still, I am grateful to address you on behalf of the victims, to provide an overview of the toll exacted on this small Christian community, and to summarize the current status of restitution of Holocaust-era assets.

    The community of Jehovah's Witnesses, or Bibelforscher, in Germany numbered about 25,000 in 1933. Several thousand Witnesses lived in countries later occupied by Nazi forces. As in all countries, Witnesses abstained from political involvement. Nazi persecution of the religious group was swift and severe. The Witnesses were among the first groups targeted by the Hitler government. The demands of the regime were wholly incompatible with the teachings of the Witnesses, whose religious tenets included strong ethical values opposed to Nazi antisemitism and violence. The Witnesses' conspicuous refusal to pay homage to Hitler, to participate in nationalistic and military activities, and to adapt their religious doctrine to the Nazi racial agenda led to severe consequences. Danish journalist Niels J¸rgensen, imprisoned in Neuengamme, later wrote of the Witnesses: "Their 'crime' was that it was against their profound religious conviction to bend their knee (or stretch out their arm) to any human ruler."(2)

    Witnesses also determinedly continued their religious ministry despite a series of government bans, which were instituted progressively in German states beginning in April 1933. Having firsthand experience with the criminal nature of the regime, Witnesses used their printed underground literature to expose Nazi brutality against their members. The Witnesses' international publications also carried extensive details about Nazi crimes against others, focusing particular and frequent attention on the looting and destruction of the Jewish community. The Gestapo invested considerable resources in an effort to suppress the production and distribution of The Watchtower and other Witness publications. Where underground printing operations were discovered, Nazi authorities seized printing equipment and punished offenders with utmost severity. Those executed for participation in this work included a grandmother who lived near Oberhausen, Germany. She was arrested on June 2, 1944, and beheaded. The vigor with which Nazi authorities pursued Witnesses and seized their property must be said to be in large measure due to their nonviolent resistance, as exemplified in Witness pamphlets.
    Persecution increased markedly with the introduction of military conscription, and the Witnesses count among their dead 364 conscientious objectors, 260 of whom were executed following sentencing by military courts. This constitutes, by the way, the largest number of executed conscientious objectors belonging to a single group. This fact also bears heavily on subsequent efforts by surviving members to receive restitution for their losses. I will deal with this in more detail in a moment. Evangelical theologian Martin Niemöller said of the Witnesses, "And to think that we Christians of today are ashamed of the so-called sect of the Ernste Bibelforscher, who by the hundreds and thousands have gone into concentration camps and died because they refused to serve in war and declined to fire on human beings."(3)

    Among the legal measures enacted to penalize individual Witnesses were expulsions from civil service and teaching posts, confiscation of businesses and property, seizure of bank accounts, cessation of pensions and disability insurance, removal of children to reeducation facilities, sterilization, and incarceration(4). Property and assets were seized by authorities and little was recoverable after the war. Ultimately, some 10,000 Witnesses served sentences in camps and prisons. Some 500 children were taken into custody. About 2,500 Witnesses died as a result of torture, maltreatment, or execution.

    The Nazi persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses was clearly based on the regime's hostility toward the Witnesses' religious ideology. The Witness victims were mostly ethnic Germans, and at first the Hitler regime hoped they could be rehabilitated; thus, they were not slated for wholesale physical annihilation. This is evident by the remarkable offer of freedom to any incarcerated Witness willing to sign a document renouncing his or her faith and pledging allegiance to the State. No such choice was given to other Nazi victims, especially not to victims of racial persecution. Few Witnesses consented to adopt Nazi ways. Hence, thousands suffered years of imprisonment and abuse and, in the process, lost everything they owned. This was true in occupied lands as well. For instance, in the Netherlands, a directive by the Municipal Police of Emmen stated that once an individual was identified as a Witness, "all possessions, houses, land or any property must be confiscated, in addition to magazines, books and name lists."

    Specifically regarding losses of cultural assets, it should be said that the Witness population constituted a relatively young community in Europe with a short history and few material holdings that could be considered museum objects. Witnesses had been active in Germany since about 1902, but more than half the Witnesses in 1933 had only joined the faith during the previous five years.
    Worship services were commonly held in rented meeting halls, which were usually simple and unadorned, and the manner of worship did not include ceremonial objects.

    However, each congregation would have had a collection of sacred books and reference works, and some also kept valuable archives of the religious life and activities of its members. With the community's emphasis on Bible scholarship, individual members also maintained personal libraries of Bibles and study books. Since "witnessing" was a key component of the faith, many congregations or individuals commonly owned printing equipment and substantial inventories of Bible literature for distribution to the public. During raids and house searches, the police and Gestapo routinely confiscated and destroyed all such valuables.
    For instance, when the Magdeburg, Germany, office of the Watch Tower Society was seized and closed in late June 1933, 25 tons of literature, then valued at $750,000, were confiscated and destroyed(5).

    No systematic demographic survey has been done to determine the socio-economic composition of the community, the members of which seem to have been drawn from every level of society. Although many personal testimonies of Witness victims have been gathered, assessment of material losses has been made more difficult because their testimonies tend to focus on the spiritual battles they waged to retain their faith and values. Little mention is made of their pre- or post-War economic situation. Witnesses generally accepted their losses as the price paid for maintaining their religious convictions. With the help of donations from fellow members overseas, the victims tended to concentrate on rebuilding their family life and religious community, rather than to pursue the recovery of plundered assets.
    A hindering factor in any such efforts was the reluctance of government officials to recognize the victimization of Witnesses, thus offering them little hope of ever recovering lost property. The situation regarding restitution in individual countries is as follows:
    In Austria, about 35 Jehovah's Witnesses have received a single payment out of the National Fund of the Republic of Austria. A few more have applied for and received a small pension. However, many have found it difficult to obtain official recognition as victims of the Nazi regime. There have been special difficulties in the case of men who were executed for refusing to perform military service. Surviving relatives were initially denied compensation. Witnesses who were sent to asylums and Nazi reeducation facilities as children still find it difficult to receive any compensation.

    In Belgium and France, a few Witnesses have received small payments. In the Czech Republic, Hungary, Luxembourg, Russia, and Ukraine, no known compensation has been received by victims. In Poland and Slovakia, a few dozen Witnesses received a small amount from the Swiss Fund for Needy Victims of the Holocaust. In Norway and the Netherlands, partial compensation was received by the national offices of Jehovah's Witnesses for confiscated property.

    In Germany the Federal Law for Compensation recognizes Jehovah's Witnesses as a so-called group of persecution. Paragraph 1 of this law grants claims to all who were persecuted because of "reasons of religion." However, a problem exists with regard to Witnesses who suffered as conscientious objectors. German law does not consider Jehovah's Witnesses who were conscientious objectors because of religious conviction as being entitled to compensation, nor does the German Federal Court regard the subsequent persecution of these individuals as persecution "due to reasons of religion." The court has reasoned that it was not their religious conviction that motivated Nazi courts to punish them but their denial to "perform the legally required military service." Therefore, the court has concluded that "a specific National Socialistic act of injustice" could not be established(6).

    The German Democratic Republic (GDR) originally recognized Jehovah's Witnesses as "victims of Fascism" and "persons persecuted by the Nazi regime". However, in 1949 steps were taken to strip the Witnesses of this status because of their position of Christian neutrality toward the Communist government. The decision rendered on February 1, 1949 stated that:
    "The status of Victim of Fascism must be awarded only on the basis of political activity and exemplary execution of vocational assignments. It cannot be expected today that special privileges are granted only because a person was persecuted during the Nazi period due to just any religious or political reason."

    As a result, all qualifying Witnesses in the GDR lost their rights to compensation from 1949 to 1989, resulting in a lifelong economic loss to an estimated 6,000 persons(7).

    On the positive side, Jehovah's Witnesses have been identified as one of the class categories in the Swiss Banks Settlement Agreement and many will also qualify for payments by the Foundation for Remembrance, Responsibility and the Future. The losses of the small community of Jehovah's Witnesses pale beside the inestimable and tragic losses of the Jewish community, as well as other targeted peoples. Material losses notwithstanding, the surviving Witnesses would count it among their greatest losses if the blood of their brethren, as well as their own sufferings for the sake of their God and their religious values, would go unrecognized in the record of history. I am therefore gratified to represent them here today.

    (1) A special dilemma has been encountered by at least one Jewish survivor from Lwow who became one of Jehovah's Witnesses after her incarceration. She suffers severe health problems from maltreatment in Auschwitz-Birkenau and Bergen-Belsen. Her application to the Claims Conference was refused because, as stated in their letter dated Frankfurt, 26.08.99, "The financial means that the Claims Conference administrates are meant for Holocaust survivors who were Jewish at the time of persecution and are still Jewish now [emphasis in original]." This reply caused the survivor acute distress and has discouraged her from further efforts to apply for financial assistance.

    (2) Jorgensen, Niels. Paa det tyske Slavemarked (Copenhagen, 1945), pp. 157-158.

    (3) Niemöller, Martin. Of Guilt and Hope (New York: Philosophical Library [no date]), p. 58.

    (4) Of German Witnesses, 1,687 lost jobs, 284 lost businesses, 457 had trade licenses revoked, and 826 were denied pensions.

    (5) "The Society has sustained a great material loss, its name has been injured and besmirched by the action of the German authorities, thousands of books belonging to the Society, valued at about $750,000, were burnt and destroyed without justification and without warning." (The Golden Age, April 25, 1934, p. 455)

    (6) Commenting on Germany's restitution to non-Jewish victims of Nazi persecution, Special Master Judah Gribetz commented: "Persecuted Jehovah's Witnesses and Roma have been eligible for compensation virtually from the inception of these programs, such as Germany's BEG promulgated in the 1950s. . . . Nevertheless, compensation to the Roma, Jehovah's Witnesses, disabled and homosexual victims of the Nazis generally has been more limited in scope and beset by difficulties, including continuing prejudice and mischaracterization of the victims." (In Re Holocaust Victims Assets Litigation [Swiss Banks] Special Master's Proposal, September 11, 2000, p. 139ff.)

    (7) Information for this summary is largely based on "Spiritual Resistance and Its Costs for a Christian Minority-A Documentary Report of Jehovah's Witnesses Under Nazism 1933-1945," October 1999, submitted to Special Master Judah Gribetz as background documentation on the history of Jehovah's Witnesses.

  • bluesapphire
    bluesapphire

    Hawk etal, Just wanted youguys to know that this information is definitely hitting home! It is not a waste. It is plain as day as I said a long time ago that the best thing that could happen was that they get kicked out or they disassociate. The status they will lose will cause them to lose big time $$$ in the world. And we all know that the GNASHING OF THEIR TEETH begins when they lose the $$$$.

    Keep up the good work. I have an uncle who works for the UN. I am going to call him up this weekend. Maybe that's another avenue we could use to get info - although youguys seem to be on top of that!

  • JT
    JT

    Leave Carol along - that's my Girl-- smile

    hey when i was at bethel we tried to get her to marry this fellow lawyer a big black about 310lb- William Bell-

    she had a girl friend in my congo when i left bethel- she is a Psychologist who does work for the Society Robin Thurston is her name
    lives in Northern VA

    she flies all over the USA with Carol and Dave Olsen in legal working on Child Custody cases for FREE

    NOT TO SMART in view of the fact that wt hung her out to dry and she has still not learned her lesson

    so sad

    james

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit