Howdy Toddy,
If it's true, I think it's a positive statement, but..........
The brother doing the announcements read an experience from near Ground Zero which apparently came to a sister from Bethel. It related a brother and his wife
It's interesting that the "brother doing the announcements" didn't verify whether this account could be proven true or not -- just related it. A non-named sister (with no authority at Bethel or any other place in the WTBTS) relates an e-mail from a non-name couple who spoke to some non-named people near ground zero. And this is taken as proved truth, and announced from the platform as if the same as coming from the Governing Body of Jehovah's People. Yeah, right.
Even here, and on the old H20 -- any e-mail evidence, particularily if the source was not a proven good source - and their source was not a proven good source - was looked upon with severe speculation. Why? Because, it had been proved inaccurate before, even if sources were good ---- but this woman's e-mail is totally devoid of sources, proofs, etc., - even to the point it can't be proven that the woman, or an e-mail, or a jw couple witnessing to the President of the US exist. It can be proven that the President exists, but that's it.
If verified by the President, then I'll accept it as something said by a politician, but then --- that truth can be surely argued, eh?
I would really like to know what can be proven that the WTBTS actually did to help in this disaster. Not what they preached -- how they physically aided the victims.
waiting