Great QFR, really stupid answer from WT

by erynw 45 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • erynw
    erynw

    I originally posted this topic under "Deuteronomy 24:16 vs 2 Samuel 12:14" (http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/142118/1.ashx). It was suggested I retitle and repost it as my title did not really convey what the topic was about, so here it is again.

    I was looking at who incited David to take the census, Satan or Jahooba (2 Sam 24:1 vs 1 Chron 21:1). Anyway, I was searching the WT 2006 CD and I came across this QFR that has nothing to do with what I was looking for, but I could not believe what I was reading. THIS has to be one of the most inane "Reasonings" from the scriptures I have ever read. This is from the 8-1-1960 WT, QFR:

    How can Deuteronomy 24:16, which says, "Children should not be put to death on account of fathers," be harmonized with the fact that the offspring of the adulterous relation between David and Bath-sheba died due to their sin, as shown in 2 Samuel 12:14?—J. B., U.S.A.

    The law, as stated at Deuteronomy 24:16, shows that fathers were not to be put to death for their sons nor were sons to be put to death for their fathers. In man's administration of justice each was to die for his own sin, and not drag innocent relatives down with him. In this particular case of David and Bath-sheba neither of them had a right to the child and so there was no injustice in their being deprived of it. Besides, as an uncircumcised, unnamed infant it had not as yet developed any personality pattern or consciousness so as to appreciate life. Then again, Bath-sheba could have been stoned to death for her adultery, in which case the unborn child would also have perished. However, as previously noted in The Watchtower, David was shown mercy because of the Kingdom covenant, which Jehovah had made with him. Nevertheless, to drive home the fact of Jehovah's displeasure he let the child die, which was a very severe blow to King David. Two similar instances are recorded in David's life: One was in connection with the death of Uzzah, who tried to steady the ark of the covenant; the other was the destruction of tens of thousands of Israelites because King David presumptuously and proudly determined to number the hosts of Israel. (1 Chron. 15:13; 21:1-27) Such records as these magnify the supremacy of Jehovah God and underscore the words: "He [God] doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou?"—Dan. 4:35, AS.

  • IP_SEC
    IP_SEC

    That has to be one of the worst quotes I've ever seen from the Wacktower liturgy.

  • nvrgnbk
    nvrgnbk

    Wonderful find, erynw!

    They are heartless misogynists!

    I am glad to be free from all that repugnant life-hating soul-raping propaganda.

    Besides, as an uncircumcised, unnamed infant it had not as yet developed any personality pattern or consciousness so as to appreciate life. Then again, Bath-sheba could have been stoned to death for her adultery, in which case the unborn child would also have perished.

    Why do they oppose abortion then?

    Disgusting and disturbing.

  • IP_SEC
    IP_SEC
    In this particular case of David and Bath-sheba neither of them had a right to the child and so there was no injustice in their being deprived of it. Besides, as an uncircumcised, unnamed infant it had not as yet developed any personality pattern or consciousness so as to appreciate life.

    Isnt jehooba such a hypocrit? It is ok for him to abort a featus.

    They use the same reason in reverse for why abortion is wrong.

    In this particular case of Sam and Jenny neither of them had a right to the child and so there was no injustice in their aborting of it. Besides, as an uncircumcised, unnamed infant it had not as yet developed any personality pattern or consciousness so as to appreciate life.

    What do you think WTS would say about this quote?

  • IronClaw
    IronClaw

    This should be put on every-one's "Quotes" files for future use.

    The Claw.

  • dobbie
    dobbie

    what a bl**dy sick answer!

  • Witness 007
    Witness 007

    I think the person in-charge of Questions from readers is a habitual drug abuser, and should gets some help. Thatt's horrible!! I'll use that article in case my wife needs an abortion???

  • 4digitcode
    4digitcode

    hey hey hey you're not getting me this time Deaconbluez is at it again and is just posting under his friends name RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT??????? cause this is by far some of these sickest crap i ever heard from them. i hope that reader left the org after that answer. IP_SEC that was my exact reaction!!! notice how they even say after that well the baby would have died anyway along with his mama if she had been stoned so...like...2 reasons why it's ok...like whatever.

  • garybuss
    garybuss

    Going to meetings in the 50's was like sitting in an insane asylum.

  • erynw
    erynw
    hey hey hey you're not getting me this time Deaconbluez is at it again and is just posting under his friends name RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT??????? cause this is by far some of these sickest crap i ever heard from them. i hope that reader left the org after that answer. IP_SEC that was my exact reaction!!! notice how they even say after that well the baby would have died anyway along with his mama if she had been stoned so...like...2 reasons why it's ok...like whatever.

    Nope, I'm not Deaconbluez. The part that also bothers me is the last couple of sentences. Basically, who are you to question God, he can do what he damn well wants and doesn't need to explain why it's contradictory. Unbelievable!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit