Great QFR, really stupid answer from WT

by erynw 45 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • watson
    watson

    Why do they oppose abortion then?

    Am I missing something, or isn't that a HUGE question here?

    Good one, NVR

  • Atlantis
    Atlantis

    (Credit goes to erynw) Watchtower-1960-August-1st-pp.479-480 See very bottom of scan #1 and top of scan # 2. http://www.imagger.com/view/205829_scan-10001.jpg.html http://www.imagger.com/view/274129_scan-20001.jpg.html Cheers! Atlantis-

  • AWAKE&WATCHING
    AWAKE&WATCHING

    They are a FREAKSHOW.

  • carla
    carla

    marking this for later. Of course most jw's today would say that is soooo old, not current light.

  • watson
    watson

    Hey...it worked in 1960!

  • oompa
    oompa

    Erynw, I TOLD you this was one of the BEST worst statements ever! I feel like printing the actual article, putting it on the hall bulliten board or epoxing it on the front door or or in the bathrooms on the inside of the stall door, (hey could put a lot of stuff there just taped up and I bet pubs would take it in secret).

    keep em coming...oompa

  • erynw
    erynw

    Erynw, I TOLD you this was one of the BEST worst statements ever! I feel like printing the actual article, putting it on the hall bulliten board or epoxing it on the front door or or in the bathrooms on the inside of the stall door, (hey could put a lot of stuff there just taped up and I bet pubs would take it in secret).

    keep em coming...oompa

    You sure did! I'm glad more folks are getting to read it. Thanks for suggesting I retitle and repost it.

  • bigdreaux
    bigdreaux

    hey, i get it now! obves is actually a writer for the society!!!!

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    Besides, as an uncircumcised, unnamed infant it had not as yet developed any personality pattern or consciousness so as to appreciate life.
    Does this mean the WTS is Pro-Choice?

  • Frequent_Fader_Miles
    Frequent_Fader_Miles

    The nerve of these people! How presumptious! Imagine purporting that David and Bathsheba were not "entitled" to the child, then assuming that the unborn child couldn't appreciate life!! What a load of bull! If under the Mosaic Law, the principle of "a life for a life" was applicable in the case of an unborn child's death, how could the Watchtower possibly reason this way?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit