Another attempt to stop mass exodus when the inevitable happens. It's only a matter of time now before the pedophile scandals are going to hit the newspapers and Time magazine, and the Tower wants its members to think of it all as lies. They can start getting court orders to force ex-members to start "honoring the contract of baptism", even ordering them what to say and how and when, and still dodge the embarrassment that would result if they will not believe it. (Yet, I bet they will get really harsh if one such person were to actually rat them out ).
A little girl getting baptized because of fear of getting destroyed at Armageddon if she doesn't? This is only going to create serious problems later. They have no right to use threat of initiatory force (i.e., destruction at Armageddon) to get people that young (or for that matter, anyone) to join and/or stay in the organization. That's one ruined childhood. There is a good chance she will get disfellowshipped before hitting age 30; even in not, her life is going to be a mess of fear, stagnation, and following orders.
To compare, I joined a program (which tends to objectivism) last year. In there, there is no mention of its being a requirement to join in order to survive. No one is coerced to join or stay, or to be active once in. In fact, the sole rule governing the whole paradigm is the prohibition of use of initiatory force, threat of force, or fraud against another person or their property (this is similar to Ayn Rand's philosophy; Aristotle and Socrates came up with it originally). Independent thinking is strongly encouraged there, and they invite people to check critical sites and material just to have the opportunity to examine it before getting in. And I have seen a few people (notably, most have not looked very much into it) call that a scam. Independent thinking encouraged--that would be death to any cult. If people call that a scam, then what would they think about an organization that not only permits initiatory force, threat of force, and fraud; they use it! And they as good as ban independent thinking--if I would encourage being familiar with all sides of an Aristotelian program that encourages independent thinking and bans initiatory force, threat of force, or fraud, then how the [a swear word] would a little girl benefit from an organization that is built on initiatory fraud?