Even though I agree 100% with virtually everything Sirona says, the rank and file will say, "There
goes that wild apostate claiming nonsense again." Again, I will taper it for them.
I got interrogated about it and was told that the cost of the [Braille] book was too high to just "give out" and that the person had to be 100% interested and 100% willing to give a donation. They don't want blind people being JWs - problems getting them to do your sales for you.
There are many congregations where it would never be asked. A Bible is a Bible, so "...get our warped
NWT into their hands so we can start working on converting them. " And actually, in the U.S., Braille
material is shipped postal for free (or virtually free) so it could be mailed without that being a factor.
Here's how the congregation elder trained properly might say this:
"Who are you ordering a Braille Bible for? Have you managed to start a study with them?
Are you sure they are interested in the truth and not just wanting a free Bible?"
We were carefully schooled to say "there is no charge, but we accept donations"......ALWAYS always mention a donation.
It's the publishers who are getting weak in this area. It shows the force of the WT cult can only go
so far. The vast majority of publishers who are not pioneers virtually never ask for the donations, but
donate themselves. Many pioneers remember, but still don't always ask. I think our wires were
crossed by our programming. We were programmed to "place" literature, get a decent number of
"placements" on our field service report. We feel that asking for donations will reduce our "placements."
We don't "place" much anyway, so we just can't ask.
Donations from the field are down. Many people don't think twice about donating a dollar for a decent
Bible. Imagine how much they think they should donate for a paperback Bible. The magazines are
viewed as thick flyers that should be free.
I'd be prepared to bet that they get more donations for the literature than they did before.
I don't disagree quickly with that, but I don't quite see it that way. For awhile, they probably did
get more instead of less. That's their problem- they thought this would continue. Well, times are
rough. I bet they get more in poor nations than they do in the U.S. or Britain from the average
householder. Poor people will think they are able to donate a decent amount and feel good about
doing so. I stand by my thoughts that they still come out ahead, but I bet the margin is reducing.