Good thread Nic.
Ok, here is my problem with the "natural selection" theory. Humans have an extremely fragile shell, in comparison to many of our animal counterparts, if indeed natural selection (Darwin's theory originally) is true, then how the hell did humans evolve to be at the top of the food change, it would make more logical sense that a creature of more strength physically (i.e. a gorilla, a rhino) would have evolved to surpass human beings. IMO
I don't believe in the christian idealogy of "God" but I find it extremely hard to believe that the vast flora and fauna on this planet, in fact the planet itself, it just a big accident. How can you make matter out of nothing? I have asked that to a few evolutionists and they have many contrived answers, just as contrived as christians trying to prove God exists. It's all theory. No one has proven crap all either way. There are a million theories, pro and con evolution/creation. Personally, until I have absolute proof either way, the jury is still out for me.
After all, "Lucy" is mostly plaster of paris, along with all the other "early man" skeletons that have been uncovered. When they find a bunch of them, intact, I will rethink it. That being said, I don't believe in some "God" figure who hails down punishment and law to humanity either. That makes absolutely no logical sense either. If "God" existed as the biblical "God" he's got some splainin to do. Because he has to save face in front of some of his creatures, he'll let the rest of his creations suffer for an undetermined amount of time, hmmm, where is the "love" in that??
I prefer to think that perhaps something greater than ourselves helped create our existence, for no other purpose than to create. That humanity is just one of countless creations across the universe, who were given a push and left to develop on our own. What we do with that gift, is entirely on our shoulders and there is no savior coming to save us from ourselves. We have the ability to improve all on our own.
People who are christian often say, that man cannot save himself, cannot direct his own "step". Thus the need for a daddy figure to punish and scold us into good behavior. I look at the vast leaps in humanity even in the last 30 years and disagree. When before in history have parents stopped and said, this beating of kids, isn't right, we should try to reason with our children, talk to them? Only a short while ago, it was globally common place to take out a belt and wawloup your child for any given reason, it is not acceptable today. It's not acceptable to call someone, a "Jap" or well you get the drift..humanity is improving for the better, but no great change happens overnight, ok I got off topic there, lol.
But for myself, disbelief in religion and the stereotypical "God" doesn't translate into the belief that everything is just a big accident. If truly it was all an accident and it is the case that natural selection is the rule of the universe, why would a parent die to save their child, knowing full well they could have other children? If it is truly survivial of the fittest, it would make logical sense that selflessness could not exist to that degree. Heck, maybe aliens created mankind and blueprinted us with certain emotional and mental characteristics. Is that theory any less probable than a big bang, or god existing? Me thinks not. Like I said, the jury is still out.