I was thinking of this one;
Can somebody make a copy of this video??
by horrible life 24 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
-
-
AlphaOmega
Thanks
-
Finally-Free
I wonder why Paul, Moses and other bible writers in "god's organization" earlier didn't have their writings copywrited. Guess that's what the difference between "inspired by god" and "spirit directed".
Good one!
W
-
Honesty
I wonder why Paul, Moses and other bible writers in "god's organization" earlier didn't have their writings copywrited. Guess that's what the difference between "inspired by god" and "spirit directed".
LRG
The cult knew that they eventually would be called on their blasphemous food and were mistakenly directed by their demon spirits to copyright their writings.
It didn't take cuz of the Fair Use laws that we have today.
The boyz in Brooklyn need to find some different spirits to inspire them.
-
Sunspot
(YAWN) .....yet ANOTHER pitiful and lame excuse for the WTS behavior. You would THINK that "THE only true religion"....being BLESSED AND LED by God and RUN BY Jesus.....would not have to resort to these pathetic bleatings when their teachings and their operations go sour.
-
DazedAndConfused
I'm surprised that they still put her name in as being a Dr. Well, not too surprised. I put Gail Bethea-Jackson in a search engine and all but one site lists her as a LCSW-C. The only one I found deviating from that is the JW site listing her as a Doctor.I found out that LCSW means Licensed Clinical Social Worker. I'm not sure what the C stands for but I would think it may mean counselor. Anyway, here are a couple of site for her:
This lists her as social Worker:
http://www.yellowpages.com/info-LMS68265771/Bethea-Jackson-Gail-A-Social-Wrkr/maps?from=qpibp
This lists her background:
-
horrible life
Thank you to a member, who helped me to get a copy of this video. I wanted to get a copy, before the JW's decided it damaged them more. So I have it, if research is needed.
Here is the original thread, with more info and research.
-
Fatfreek
That video transcript (I didn't watch because of my poor internet speed) reminds me of the WTS diversionary technique used in the 1975 yearbook that refers to the 1925 prediction fiasco.
Instead of making an apology over what they had said about that failed 1925 prediction they allowed a recollection -- an obvious misinterpretation of what had been printed in the years prior to 1925 -- by an elderly member from a congregation somewhere.
"...So, as Anna McDonald recalls: '1925 was a sad year for many brothers. Some of them were stumbled; their hopes were dashed...Instead of its being considered a 'probability', they read into it that it was a 'certainty', and some prepared for their own loved ones with expectancy of their resurrection." 1975 Yearbook, p. 146.
They couldn’t have solicited a better testimony. Here, a blurred (and incorrect) memory of this elderly person could serve their purpose far better than actual statements readily available from their archived records. [we can't let facts get in the way of a good story]
No, the WTS never had used that word probability in those pre-1925 writings -- a lone woman did it for them. Nonetheless, by quoting this person, they subscribed to what she mistakenly recounted , knowing well that her remembered term probability was nowhere to be found in any of the original pre-1925 textual claims -- knowing well it would serve their obvious purpose -- that of perpetuating Rutherford’s cover-up. Yes, Rutherford’s cover-up now became the modern WTS cover-up.Len Miller
-
POs Son
Anyone notice the little baby angel picture behind the fine doctor? Oh, and I am changing my first name to Doctor.
-
Fatfreek
Len Miller
