Paul's Letters: Part of "All Scripture ..." ?

by compound complex 88 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • R.Crusoe
    R.Crusoe

    I know what burn the ships means. A hot young naked female would be sweet on the eye to aid the information intake.

    At the end of the day constipated is often what peoples minds become through taking in contradictory pages of belief and not letting go with their next visit to the toilet.

    And if you want old just take a look at some of the dates your taking opinions from. They were written a long time ago and the ages of the writers was likely in the 3rd or 4th quartile of their lives.

    But ask yourself, is any of the above relevant to whether the information came straight from Gods latest newsroom in the cosmos - food at the proper time for them and for us today - or had the ideas already been circulating other cultures in the same way? Much the same as when the good news was offered by way of invite at the end of gun barrels to American Indians, Aboriginees, Maoris and other nations whilst at the same time ensuring a sizeable cut of their economies paid high prices for the information?

    Religion has a history which is a far cry from trying to please a LOVING GOD!!

  • AllTimeJeff
    AllTimeJeff
    Religion has a history which is a far cry from trying to please a LOVING GOD!!

    What ammuses me is when a thiest is hell bent on believing in god. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty can't point to traditional religion as the answer without implicating YHWH, Jesus, or other mythical gods that people worship. Too many questions are raised. So what to do if you are a thiest, in this age of critical thinking? In the age of Chis Dawkins and Sam Harris?

    You join the "discredit the bible/holy book" club. Thats right, you don't need it. All you need is a "personal relationship" with "god". And it's almost bulletproof, if logic didn't exist that is. Because you can claim that "god talks to you" and not have to produce a shred of evidence. You can be a "slave of Christ" while claiming that you don't need the gospels. Hey, "Take my word for it!" Because thats all that we can do. All you have to do is "let God in your heart and listen to him." It's that simple. Unless you are evil or not approved. Then you can't be in the "cool thiests" club that doesn't even need a holy book. God just doesn't care enough about YOU to give you a personal message.

    Thiesm falls flat on its face when pressed for evidence. Bleeding sincere hearts make the case against thiesm, not for it.

  • AGuest
    AGuest

    May you both have peace!

    The Bible is simply the oldest (or one of the oldest) cult handbooks. It teaches obedience through fear in the guise of love.

    Actually, it is those who USE the Bible to teach such guise that do so. Although there are many who consider the Bible a “living” document, it really is not; rather, it is simply a compilation of writings, including, but not limited to scripture, that many use to “dominate” their fellow man… to the “injury” of both. They claim that God speaks to us by means of it, and using this lie, hold dominion over myriads – God USED to speak to us by means of the prophets; NOW, He speaks to us… by means of His Son.

    … anyone can say anything they want regarding such "personal" revelations or communications with "god", "Christ", etc.

    You are SO correct; indeed, many have and do!

    there is no point arguing with you.

    Please do not consider this an “argument” – I know there are “rules” to “proper” arguing and I am no expert at it. I can only speak what is true with regard to this particular matter.

    The fact that you believe it is obviously enough for you. I certainly can in no way take your word for it.

    Thankfully, my experience is not based simply on what I believe – it is based on what actually occurs. But I TOTALLY understand that you can’t take my word for it. You said that you have not read my posts, and so I understand that you might think that I think you should take my word for it; however, among several things that I have said and shared since “speaking” here is that you should NOT take my word for it. Absolutely NOT. I have posted, on several occasions and in several threads that that is NOT what my Lord desires. And so I say to YOU, dear ATF, do NOT take my word for it – I am nothing more than a good for nothing slave and what I have to say is of no value at all. I do not share what I do because I think you and others should listen to ME: I do it because I am HOPING that you… and others… might SOME day condescend to listen… to HIM. If you don’t know that he, my Lord, SPEAKS, however (because, certainly, I can’t see where you’ve been told/taught that he does), how will you know that he DOES… and HOW to listen/hear?

    I wonder if you have ever considered why your "god" does not reveal himself in a similar way to others? Or why he chooses you at the exclusion of others?

    Oh, yes! I even asked! When my Lord first came to me (which account I have shared here) I absolutely asked him why me. His response was that I “had faith the size of a mustard seed.” I cannot TELL you the depth of SADNESS I felt when I heard that: here I was [I thought] among some of THE most “faithful” people on the planet, and he was telling me that THEY didn’t have enough FAITH? How could that BE? I was almost devastated! Knowing myself… and the [very] small amount of faith I knew I had, I thought, “If this is where I am with faith, where in the world is everyone else??!!! Oh… my… God!" Truly. I was… taken aback, to say the least.

    Having come here, and other like forums, however, I now understand. Faith is TRULY lacking… in the world in general and certainly in the WTBTS. And what little faith some had while in the Borg has almost assuredly been shattered to bits by the revelation that "they" are not who and what they say they are. But the result has not been a rejection of the Borg, or of Satan; it has been a rejection (entirely, for some) of the Most Holy One of Israel, JAH of Armies, and of His Son and Christ, JAHESHUA MISCHAJAH. "They" have TRULY accomplished their goal ("to mislead, if possible, even the holy ones") with regard to many - some, they have utterly shut the kingdom from and others they have just shipwrecked. I cannot tell you how sad that TRULY makes me. And so… I am simply trying to do what I am SUPPOSED to do, which the “scribes and the Pharisees,” along with the “false christs” have NOT said to you, which is to KEEP saying, so that all who are wishing and thirsting DO hear - “Come! Take ‘life’s water’ free!”

    It would certainly be nice of him to reveal himself to all and end the confusion, don't you think?

    Absolutely! And He does/has! To some here, who have “heard,” and to some who are not here, who have “heard.” There are those here who I have also personally invited, who have said the very thing that you are saying. Yet, when I say, “You CAN do it,” they realize that they are not ready, for some reason or another. So, what can I do? I can neither lead the horse to water nor make him drink – I can only tell him that there IS water.

    If the answer to the above is a matter of how Christ divides and judges, I will have no choice but to lump you with others of your ilk, who believe that "god" will destroy a good chunk of the population for petty reasons.

    Unfortunately, you would be in error for “lumping” me so. God does not WANT… ANY to die. That some WILL is not His doing; it is because they judge… themselves.

    Logic begs an answer to the exclusionary and divisive way that "gods" followers insist on following him.

    Like many others, unfortunately, you have fallen victim to false “followers.” The blind. Who lead the blind. That you listen(ed) to them is not the fault of the Most Holy One of Israel. He told us who to listen to: His Son. That we were misled is the fault of ourselves, our parents/guardians, religious leaders, etc., those who claim to speak for God but have absolutely NO authority. There is only ONE who speaks for God, His Word, my Lord, JAHESHUA MISCHAJAH. There is NO other. And contrary to what you and other MIGHT think… I do not speak for God. I only share what I receive from His Son.

    If your answer isn't one of judgement, but that you don't know, I will again have to reject your sincere post as silly and illogical. If it is a matter of accepting your beliefs on "faith", I would call you out on your credulity.

    Reject and/or call out as you will, for my response would not be one of judgment (even Christ does not judge – who am I to do so?) – the Judgment occurs NOT because God and Christ judge… but because EARTHLING MAN judges. And wickedly so. As regards my faith, I am prepared to respond to whatever part of that you wish to challenge.

    Thats a lot of "ifs" and I dont' assume any to be your answer. But those are the general answers I have heard.

    Then I must ask you to quit lumping me in with the “general.” We are not the same, truly. The “general” considers itself wise in the things of God. I am a foolish thing, however, without wisdom and knowledge. I don’t know the things I share – I receive them, and out of love… for the One who gave to me… and the ones HE loves… I share them. As I would want others to “do unto me.”

    I praise Coco and anyone who is honestly willing to examine the source of their beliefs as to their veracity, whether that source is the bible or other mysterious voices or influences.

    As he and you should! Examining the SOURCE of one’s beliefs is noble and credible. My “source,” however, is NOT the Bible, a claim which most professed “christians” do not make.

    You join the "discredit the bible/holy book" club.

    I think you’re overstating it, dear ATJ. Saying that the Bible is not what some THINK it is does not necessarily “discredit” it – it simply states that truth, that it is NOT the Word of God, that it is NOT the “guide” some think it is, and that it is NOT the means by which God speaks to us. The Bible itself states these very facts. How is agreeing with the Bible discrediting it?

    Thats right, you don't need it.

    But the Bible itself SAYS that. Again, how is stating what the Bible itself STATES discrediting it?

    All you need is a "personal relationship" with "god".

    Well, no, that’s not entirely accurate. You’re misunderstanding… and as a result, misstating, what I and a few others are saying.

    And it's almost bulletproof, if logic didn't exist that is. Because you can claim that "god talks to you" and not have to produce a shred of evidence.

    Again, that’s inaccurate. First, God doesn’t talk to us, per se. He speaks to His Son… who speaks to us. And there is evidence, ample evidence. The problem isn’t the lack of evidence; it’s the lack of the “tool” used to observe the evidence. You know: like trying to see bacteria without a microscope, or the surface of the moon without a telescope. Or the wind… without, say, tree leaves/boughs blowing in it.

    You can be a "slave of Christ" while claiming that you don't need the gospels.

    And this is accurate. Paul claimed to be a slave of Christ – what “gospel” did he have? What “gospel” did Matthew have? Mark? Luke? Thomas? Mary the Magdalene? Barnabas? None. They initially had the Prophets (which is how they recognized MischaJah), after which they had MischaJah himself. But he left in 30CE – what “gospel” did they have after that, say, between 30CE and when the first “gospel” was written? Yet, did they not all profess to be slaves of Christ? Your “logic” fails here, dear ATJ.

    Hey, "Take my word for it!" Because thats all that we can do.

    Again, you are inaccurate – that is NOT “all” that we can do. We CAN “test the inspired expression.” We CAN listen and hear for ourselves. We CAN seek, ask, knock… and exercise faith ourselves. We don’t have to take ANYONE’s word… for ANYTHING… other than that of the Truth – Christ, the Holy Spirit. That we don’t BOTHER… is who’s fault?

    All you have to do is "let God in your heart and listen to him." It's that simple.

    Again, you’re statement is inaccurate.

    Unless you are evil or not approved. Then you can't be in the "cool thiests" club that doesn't even need a holy book. God just doesn't care enough about YOU to give you a personal message.

    ATF, I am not your judge. However, I would be remiss if I did not say that I think there’s an underlying reason for your chagrin and I would ask you to deal with that, first – you know, be honest with yourself about why you feel as you do: for example, perhaps that God doesn’t care about you because He hasn’t given you a “personal message”. I would counter that He has spoken to you, through Christ, but because you were never taught that He DOES speak… in such a manner… and that it would be to YOU… you have difficulty believing that it can, does... and did... happen. That you might attribute it to something else... anything else... doesn't mean it didn't happen.

    But I totally understand your position: if someone had told me 12 years ago that God speaks… in any form other than through the Bible… I am not sure I would have believed it, either. It had to happen to me. And it did. That you and some others cannot grasp that is… well, irrelevant. I am not looking for your approval, acceptance, validation, or corroboration. I don’t need it, truly. To belie what happened/happens to me would be for me to deny my very existence. I am here, however, and I am real (at least, as far as this realm is concerned), and what I see and hear is real. Very real. To say otherwise would be a lie. And to say otherwise because I am more concerned with whether folks such as you agree with/accept/like/approve of me… is cowardice.

    Again, I bid you peace.

    Your servant and a slave of Christ,

    SA

  • compound complex
    compound complex

    Dear Friends,

    This is all very deep and will take time to evaluate. I am, nevertheless, grateful for your scholastic input and, yet, can understand how sincerely one would feel about a personal witness.

    I am focusing more on objectivity and less on subjectivity as the latter has always been my guiding force. It surely has its place, but, for the first time in my life, I am attempting to add things up, metaphorically speaking. It's by no means as simple as basic math. There are so many variables and questions that may remain forever unanswerable.

    Your wide range of comments - based on study and personal experience - serve as starting point from which I shall begin connecting the dots.

    Gratefully,

    Compound-Complex

  • AllTimeJeff
    AllTimeJeff

    Coco, objectivity as opposed to subjectivity is a great place to start from. I make statements and argue from that which cannot be proven, and that which is not proveable. I apologize if by addressing AGuest that I took away from the intent of your thread.

    As to AGuest, again I appreciate your feelings on the matter. Rather then respond to your statements, I will simply repost the ones that are totally unproveable.

    I wonder if you have ever considered why your "god" does not reveal himself in a similar way to others? Or why he chooses you at the exclusion of others?

    Oh, yes! I even asked! When my Lord first came to me (which account I have shared here) I absolutely asked him why me. His response was that I “had faith the size of a mustard seed.” I cannot TELL you the depth of SADNESS I felt when I heard that: here I was [I thought] among some of THE most “faithful” people on the planet, and he was telling me that THEY didn’t have enough FAITH? How could that BE? I was almost devastated! Knowing myself … and the [ very ] small amount of faith I knew I had, I thought, “If this is where I am with faith, where in the world is everyone else ??!!! Oh… my… God!" Truly. I was… taken aback, to say the least.

    God does not WANT… ANY to die. That some WILL is not His doing; it is because they judge… themselves.
    I think you’re overstating it, dear ATJ. Saying that the Bible is not what some THINK it is does not necessarily “discredit” it – it simply states that truth, that it is NOT the Word of God, that it is NOT the “guide” some think it is, and that it is NOT the means by which God speaks to us. The Bible itself states these very facts. How is agreeing with the Bible discrediting it?
    Again, that’s inaccurate. First, God doesn’t talk to us, per se. He speaks to His Son… who speaks to us. And there is evidence, ample evidence. The problem isn’t the lack of evidence; it’s the lack of the “tool” used to observe the evidence. You know: like trying to see bacteria without a microscope, or the surface of the moon without a telescope. Or the wind… without, say, tree leaves/boughs blowing in it.
    I would counter that He has spoken to you, through Christ, but because you were never taught that He DOES speak… in such a manner… and that it would be to YOU… you have difficulty believing that it can, does... and did... happen. That you might attribute it to something else... anything else... doesn't mean it didn't happen.

    Nice. I don't know why you believe I haven't heard this before. "Christ spoke to me." No he didn't. There is a "tool" to observe the "evidence". No there isn't. You assert that people put themselves in a position where god has no choice but to destroy them due to their choices and lack of faith. Cruel and mythical, much like Zeus and other ancient gods. There is no point to being vague, but god is exactly that, where lives are supposedly at stake. And why he hasn't revealed himself to us, because faith is lacking? Oh. Ridiculous. Your lord and Christ, JAHESHUA MISCHAJAH insists on playing the playground game of "tag, your it". It is his fault that he is an absentee parent. There is no good that comes from the billions that suffer. There is no good that comes from insisting that as humans we play by rules of evidence that he doesn't feel obligated to follow. We have to show evidence when we deal with one another, but JAHESHUA MISCHAJAH or whoever you want to call him doesn't.

    I know one thing AGuest. I know you exist, because we have communicated. I have more faith in you then JAHESHUA MISCHAJAH. At least you talk.

  • Inkie
    Inkie

    So, ATJ, the bottom line is that you do not believe that God exists because he has not spoken to you, nor will you believe, that God and/or His Son speak. And there you go. You believe that Jah and his Son, Jaheshua, are non-existant, but if existing, are dumb/mute--either incapable or unwilling to speak.

    Question: If AGuest told you that President Bush or Hillary or Obama spoke to her said such and such, would you believe her? Why? Have you already spoken with any of them? If not, what is the likelihood of you doing so? And if you wanted to, what hoops would you have to go through in order to do so?

    Kind of reminds me of Naaman when he was told to go wash by a small child and he got all irate, first, because he was told to wash my a little girl, and continued irate because rather than do the simple thing of washing, he wanted to be told to do some great task in order to be cleansed.

    Ah well . . . .

    Inkie

  • JosephMalik
    JosephMalik

    Leolaia,

    In a way you are right when you show that Jude contained words and phrases that were also found in the book of 1 Enoch. But such use was not intended to canonize his writings or verify their accuracy. They were by then common thoughts and expressions used also by a specific group of Jewish Christians he was trying to reach, heavy hitters that took Nazarite vows or were deeply involved in Judaism in much the same way that James was. But Jude did not beat around the bush like James who also tried to protect himself in his letter. He went straight for their throats and that would have included James who was also involved this way and with such views for much of his life. They would know who they were by the words used which you also compared to 1 Enoch. He would show them that they were wrong and their Christianity would not save them just as it did not save the angels that left Egypt their first estate with the Jews. Such angels (Egyptian witnesses) were witnesses to the miracles that freed Israel and embraced it only to afterward lose their lives in the wilderness. His message was a warning for such Jews to repent: 19 These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit. [Jews who separated from Gentiles] 20 But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, 21 Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life. [as compared to those that did not] 22 And of some have compassion, making a difference: 23 And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh. This was a battle of long standing and it was now time to put an end to it.

    Joseph

  • AllTimeJeff
    AllTimeJeff
    Question: If AGuest told you that President Bush or Hillary or Obama spoke to her said such and such, would you believe her? Why?

    Yes I would. The difference is that the entire world knows that Hillary, Obama and Bush exist. We have documented evidence!

    If by the tens of millions, god would simply get thousands or even millions together the way politicians do, allow himself to be filmed, then there wouldn't be a question of his existence would there?

    Lets reverse the question though? If Bush, Obama or Hillary decided that they never wanted a picture taken of them, that we only knew of them through writings that their press people put out, and no one had ever really seen them, don't you think we would question their existence?

  • AGuest
    AGuest

    May you have peace!

    Besides that fact that the Christ is well-documented, and besides the fact that God has, in fact, shown Himself... plainly... and besides the fact that just because YOU don't believe He does and has... I am told (by the Spirit) that your argument contains a serious flaw: SEEING... is NOT necessarily believing.

    The word of my Lord to you is that it is no more the fault of the Most Holy One of Israel that YOU do not see and hear that which is SPIRITUAL, than it was the fault of Mr. and Mrs. Keller that Helen could not see or hear... that which is PHYSICAL. However, she was given a TEACHER... who helped her to "see"... and "hear"... that which she could not. Had she utterly rejected the teacher her parents provided... or ANY teacher who tried to help her... she would have NEVER "seen" nor "heard." She was able to do so, however, because although her physical body could not see and hear because it lacked the proper TOOLS, her teacher, Annie Sullivan, was able to show her a DIFFERENT "way."

    It is the exact same thing here: YOU... cannot see or hear that which is SPIRITUAL... because you lack the proper TOOLS (i.e., a spirit body). However, you were given a TEACHER... who came to show you a DIFFERENT "way." That you choose to reject the Teacher... and his "way"... is no one's fault... but your own. You cannot blame God, any more than Helen could blame her parents. And you certainly cannot blame the teacher. He tried and still tries, just like Annie Sullivan; unfortunately, unlike Helen... most of US... give up... before we fully understand what the Teacher is TRYING to teach and say to us... and how.

    May the one with an ear to hear... HEAR what the Spirit says.

    I bid you the greatest of peace, dear ATJ.

    Your servant and a slave of Christ,

    SA

  • AllTimeJeff
    AllTimeJeff

    AGuest

    This is what thiesm is left to argue with in a modern world when it can't hide behind superstition. Helen Keller.

    Lest we forget that we have evidence of Hellen Keller, and Annie Sullivan, such as pictures and books... To say nothing of the fact that neither of them claimed to be supernatural, demanding worship and blind obediant faith under threat of eternal destruction. Last I checked, they were two humans who accomplished extraordinary things. I would also be remiss to point out that restoring sight to the blind is something the bible claims Jesus did. Hellen Keller received no such consideration from god. But through education and a dedicated teacher, she was able to move into and exist in the world around her, though blind and "dumb" (to borrow a bible word)

    So you would use this as a metaphorical teaching device to help me to see that my own version of Annie Sullivan came and went and I wasn't paying attention? That spiritually I am just like Helen Keller, blind and dumb?

    I do appreciate you telling me what your Lord told you to tell me.... I think.... I don't know if I like your Lord too much. If he can talk to you, he can talk to me too. I am here right now, very open to any evidence that he wants me to worship him. I would even accept voices in my head as a starting point for me to consider... Please tell him I am waiting... I turned off my TV....

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit