tophat,
You said:
: You might consider deflating your ego Farkel. After-all this steve somebody was just being a jerk. Jerks are to be ignored.
You started out with an ad hominem, then you continued with a judgement, then you reached your conclusion. In your infinite wisdom you did all of this. By yourself. Well.
Let me recap for you:
Steve2 said my post was basically, really long and not that good.
I responded by saying, "Ok, show me how you can make it better."
YOU said "consider deflating your ego, Farkel" How does THAT relate to anything? When you've been attacked, do YOU deflate your ego?
If not, why not? Does "deflating your ego" help you give a better response? If so, why so?
You then said that "steve" was a jerk. How do you know he was a jerk? If he WAS a jerk, then he wouldn't dare answer my challenge. If he WAS NOT a jerk, then he just might. We should wait and see. This comment puts you in the "judgemental twit" category, and I don't think you have earned the right to pass absolute judgement on anyone, including Steve. Last time I checked, that right was reserved for God, and maybe, Jesus Christ. Certainly not you.
: Jerks are to be ignored.
Not in your case. That is why I replied.
Farkel, the best jerk case there ever was