Fred said:
"I don't follow man. I follow my own conscience."
Then, it's true, you aren't a witness in good standing, are you?
For if you did, that would mean that your conscience would have to have reversed many times in the past:
* At one point, your conscience would have told you that a person wanting a divorce from a man who was having a homosexual affair wasn't scriptural.
* Then, a few years later, your conscience would have to change, and allow that divorce..
* Your conscience would have had to have flip-flopped many times on the "inhabitants of Sodom get ressurected or not"...
* Your conscience would have to agree that men with facial hair cannot serve as elders or MS..
* Your conscience at one time would have had to agreed that ANY AND ALL BLOOD was not to be taken for transfusion
* Now your conscience recently changed, and your conscience now says that fractions of certain blood elements are ok (matter of conscience actually)..
I have but one question, Fred..
When you thought ALL blood was bad for transfusion, and when you thought that a scriptural divorce could not be granted because of a homosexual mate (not being one flesh) what changed your conscience' mind?