Should law enforcement agencies stop using tasers?

by Gopher 49 Replies latest social current

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    On Tuesday, a 29-year-old on his way to pick up his parents at the local airport became involved in an automobile accident. When police arrived he became uncooperative and so they stunned him with a Taser gun. Now he's dead.

    There have been other recent reported deaths associated with the use of a Taser.

    Are Taser guns proven safe? What is the risk-to-benefit ratio to society? Should there be a moratorium on Taser usage until further study is done?

    Police like their effectiveness, and of course the manufacturer claims the risk of usage is minimal. But for some suspects, the use of a Taser gun has been an instant death sentence.

    Read the article below and please offer your CONSIDERED opinion. (Please no flame wars, this need not be a liberal vs. conservative fight. Please comment on what is best for society as a whole.)

    http://www.startribune.com/local/north/13841301.html

    alt

    Video from a Minnesota Department of Transportation camera showed the accident that led to a man being shot by a Taser.

    Mark Backlund

    Mark Backlund

    Father wants answers in son's death following Taser jolt

    Mark Backlund was en route to get his parents at the airport when he was "uncooperative" after an accident.

    By JIM ADAMS and EMILY JOHNS, Star Tribune

    Last update: January 17, 2008 - 9:42 AM

    Authorities are investigating the death of a 29-year-old Fridley man shot with a Taser by state troopers, who said he had become "uncooperative'' after a rush-hour crash Tuesday evening.

    The victim was identified by his father as Mark C. Backlund. Gordon Backlund said his son was on his way to pick up his parents at the airport after they had taken a short trip to Florida.

    According to the State Patrol, he was involved in a rush-hour crash on Interstate Hwy. 694 near Silver Lake Road in New Brighton. The State Patrol said troopers shot him with the Taser because he was uncooperative. He was breathing but unconscious when paramedics arrived, according to Allina Medical Transportation spokesman Tim Burke but was pronounced dead at Unity Hospital in Fridley.

    Gordon Backlund said he was told his son's heart stopped. A 1996 graduate of Fridley High School, he had no heart conditions, his father said.

    "We're looking for what really happened," said Backlund, who said his son's car was the only one involved in the crash. He described his son as caring and loyal, with a good sense of humor. "And it is just going to take time to figure this out."

    Police have praised the Taser -- which sends an electric current -- for its ability to bring a quick end to standoffs with violent suspects. But related fatalities after their use have made it controversial.

    Troopers put on leave

    Lt. Mark Peterson of the State Patrol wouldn't describe the uncooperative behavior. Five troopers at the scene were placed on routine administrative leave while the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension investigates.

    According to Chris Krueger, communications director for the Department of Public Safety, the Anoka County Medical Examiner could complete the autopsy as soon as today.

    It is the State Patrol's first Taser-related death since troopers started carrying the weapons about a year and a half ago, Peterson said.

    In Minnesota, 480 law enforcement agencies use Tasers now, compared with 219 in 2004, according to Taser International in Scottsdale, Ariz. In Minneapolis, Taser use is left to an officer's discretion, according to police spokesman Sgt. Jesse Garcia.

    He said it is used most frequently to quickly control a situation when an officer is struggling with someone. Injuries to officers struggling with offenders have decreased considerably since the department started using Tasers in 2001.

    "It takes the fight of out them," Garcia said.

    He said no one in Minneapolis has died directly from a Taser. The Hennepin County medical examiner found a Minneapolis man shot with a Taser died from cocaine abuse, heart disease and emphysema in 2003. The next year, another Minneapolis man with heart disease and hypertension died from a heart attack after he was shot with a Taser.

    Over 290 deaths nationwide

    In the United States, more than 290 people have died since June 2001 after being struck by police Tasers, according to the human rights group Amnesty International. It said in October that only 25 of the 290 were armed, and none had firearms.

    The group has called for a moratorium on Taser use until more research is done.

    "We believe that they should be used as an alternative to lethal force," said Dori Dinsmore, the group's Midwest director, "not as a tool to ensure routine compliance."

    A 2004 study from the group shows many of those who died had underlying health problems such as heart conditions or mental illness or were under the influence of drugs. Many also were subjected to repeated or prolonged shocks.

    However, Taser International spokesman Steve Tuttle said of the 290 deaths that "in the vast majority of these tragic cases medical examiners have ruled that the Taser was not the cause of death." He said Taser use was listed as contributing factor in six cases since 1998.

    He said studies cited in trials supported the company, which has not lost any of 61 product liability cases settled so far.

    "Medical documentation strongly supports that the Tasers are a safer use of force alternative compared to hands on, punches, chemical sprays, batons and canine bites," Tuttle said.

    A Taser sends a current that interrupts muscle control. The weapon fires 50,000-volt pulses of electricity. A person hit with two Taser darts typically topples to the ground.

    Backlund is survived by his parents, Gordon and Linda Backlund of Fridley, his sister Melanie Backlund Moe, and his 2-year-old son, Nathaniel.

    "We're in shock," Gordon Backlund said. "It's very hard to lose a child."

    Late Wednesday, BCA Superintendent Tim O'Malley said: "This is a traumatic event for a lot of people. Someone has died and in fairness to that person, the troopers, family members and others who may have been affected, we need to make sure that we're accurate and thorough.''

    Emily Johns can be reached at 952-882-9056 or [email protected]. Jim Adams can be reached at 612-673-7658 or [email protected].

  • BurnTheShips
  • 5go
    5go

    Your asking a guy who thinks police should disarmed totally. If the citizens can't trusted with something then the police shouldn't have it either. The police should be living in fear of the people not vice versa.

  • minimus
    minimus

    I think they should just use bullets.

    Seriously, tasers should be used in the same way as a gun should be used, sparingly. Don't shoot anyone unless it's out of absolute necessity.

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    What do you all say about this argument from the Taser company spokesman:

    "Medical documentation strongly supports that the Tasers are a safer use of force alternative compared to hands on, punches, chemical sprays, batons and canine bites," Tuttle said.

    Safer for who? Is society well-served by his product? Or are the "hands on, punches, sprays, batons, and canine bites" effective ways to subdue unruly suspects?

  • 5go
    5go

    I think they should just use bullets.

    Seriously, tasers should be used in the same way as a gun should be used, sparingly. Don't shoot anyone unless it's out of absolute necessity.

    Yeah I have family in law enforcement even they notice there are way to many Barney Fifes and Dirty Harrys working in most US police departments.

  • Brother Apostate
    Brother Apostate

    I really think it's time for all law enforcement officials to vent their anger against all of us trouble making US citizens by tazering us whenever the whim strikes them. I wouldn't restrict it to tazers alone, however- law enforcement officers, who we all know are better than the rest of us, should be allowed to randomly taze or whip, beat or stop us for any reason. I'm sure the Founding Fathers would agree wholeheartedly!

    BA- Sarcastic.

  • El Kabong
    El Kabong

    Because Tazers are supposed to be non-lethal, I think that some Officers who have them tend to "shoot first, and ask questions later". There have been too many tazerings lately, BRO!!

  • darkuncle29
    darkuncle29
    "We believe that they should be used as an alternative to lethal force," said Dori Dinsmore, the group's Midwest director, "not as a tool to ensure routine compliance."

    I think they should only use tazers if they would use their side arm, not to "ensure routine compliance".

  • Tuesday
    Tuesday

    Yeah if something is labelled as non-lethal and turns out to be lethal then it should be in the same category as a gun. The "don't taze me bro" thing was ridiculous because the kid was already down and asked not to be tazed, in that case I think those cops should be brought up on charges. I agree that the tazer should be used more sparingly, whenever I do a protest that's one of my chief worries. They leave permanent scars alot of times too.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit