Noontide, I asked for all input, and yours is valid. Here's how I feel about that.
There are people who refuse to leave the danger zone when a hurricane or similar disaster is
about to hit. Still, many in authority force them out. They are resented. Many of those that
resent it feel better when the home they lived in was destroyed. Some never get over it, because
they lost a pet when they thought they might could live through it, or they missed a great
wave to surf on. Still, they are alive.
I agree that there is a big risk factor that she will feel betrayed. But she will be alive. I don't
think I am placing my feelings before hers. I don't think that I am cold and ignorant of her possible
resentment. But if I make a decision based on the probabability that I won't be forgiven, it is my
belief that that would make me a selfish person, not the other way around. If I were a selfish
person, I could say she will die and I get the house and the bank account, or I can intervene and
she will hate me, file for separation and take half the house and the bank account. Therefore, let
her die. NO WAY.
I hope she doesn't feel that way, but if she does, she does. A life is worth saving. I think WTS is
already warping her mind. Either this situation will let her wallow more in that feeling or (more likely)
she will see how their blood doctrine is not in accord with love. Her family (in my case) will be glad
she was saved by blood and they will help her not to be destroyed over this disobedience. If not, she
will place the blame on me and maintain her sanity. Let her hate me, but at least she's alive.
I have come to think that I would give my life to save that of another, even a stranger. I feel that strong.
How could I give my life for my wife, but not be willing to sacrifice half my stuff and take on her
resentment before I save her life?
Sorry for the rant. Your point is well received, I have considered it.