I have no interest in sending my children to school, not because of religion, but because I want my children to be able to think for themselves.
Socialisation is mentioned in some of the posts and I'm curious about what people think is advantageous in 'socialisation': the history of modern schooling is based on the model created in the mid 19th century by wealthy business owners who were looking for people intelligent enough to run their factories and businesses, but NOT intelligent enough to take them over. This is why even 'gifted' children are only supported IF they conform to the social standards. And, quite frankly, western civilisation's social standards suck.
We are currently living in a time when the question of human- and planetary- continuance is up in the air because western civilisation teaches its members that consumerism before intelligent living is the 'good citizen' thing to do, where people are taught to NOT think about things too deeply (because people who are awake make crap consumers), where people are passive in the face of crimes against humanity (the non-US watched in horror as Bush was RE-elected and here in Australia the thinkers were sent into despair by the same re-election of Howard) and crimes against the planet and life are simply swept away with puerile arguments about 'economic growth' and 'we have to have JOBS, don't we? stupid greenie!'
Yes. Try being an intelligent and AWARE kid in the 'education' system, as both myself and my partner were. We very soon learned what education was actually about, which was the production of people who were obedient, unthinking and prepared to go along with anything the authorities tell them regardless of the weight of evidence before them (much like JW's, really). Both myself and my partner got top scholastic marks despite never studying a thing (Michael actually used school for sleeping from grade 5 onwards and slept his way to brilliant grade 12 results, I used it for reading from grade 4, did grade 12 three times in grades 8,9 and 10 with top results each time but was not allowed to be credited with it because it was against school policy to put kids into much higher grades than their age). We were bored by the narrow mindedness, the demands for conformity and toe-ing the line, the blatant racism, sexism and speciesim in the material taught (of COURSE humans are the dominant species- what other species has been able to drive the planet to the brink of extinction? of COURSE civilisation is superior, it did all those indigenous communities SUCH a favour in invading their lands, killing their people and bringing them the work ethic, exposure to a superior culture, the knowledge of the joys of a hard days labour, blah blah blah vomit).
Michael and I have little interest in spending time with most people, who for the most part have always found us 'weird' because we can THINK outside the boxes that civilisation strives to create for people's minds. Our kids choose what kind of schooling they experience, and have chosen (at various times) Steiner, homeschooling, public school and unschooling. They are frequently commented upon as being kids with amazingly mature and broad outlooks, they can see through crap from a mile away, they are immune to peer pressure, have zero interest in the invading culture they've been raised in and are generally considered amazing people. We think it's because we've gone to a lot of trouble to protect their essential natures from domination, bullying adults (and bullying children), cultural programming (we don't watch TV at all) and indoctrination.
I am glad that psychologically, emotionally and physically, my children are much better prepared for the coming crash than anyone else, child or adult, that we know outside our family.