It all comes down to value. If there is more value than cost in going to meetings or out in field circus, the numbers would naturally tend to go up, and there would be no need to hound anyone. On the other hand, if it costs more than it's worth (with time, money, energy, or opportunity cost), people are going to do less. Perhaps the hounder-hounder had better go to college and take Economics 207 until he is able to get a passing grade, and then start applying it.
And costs are going up. I noticed the number of Christmas decorations, which people enjoy putting up, were down sharply (probably more so than the field circus and boasting session attendance) in 2007 from 2006. Cost is the major factor--energy costs were up. Just imagine how much less field circus they are going to be able to do with gas at $3 and up a gallon instead of $1 or less. And more so now that they can't work full time or go to college to make a decent living. There simply isn't any money to put that much gas in the car--maybe the hounder-hounder should stop whining about the witless numbers being down and just be thankful that they didn't drop as sharply as the Christmas decorations did.
Or, maybe they should be jacking up the real value (not the inflated "value" which people are seeing through). If the meetings offered practical solutions to life's problems, people would be less likely to blow them off. If I could go out in field circus and not be subject to a bunch of rules, and actually have real meaningful contact with the opposite sex instead of the same crusty grumpy old men all the time, I would be more inclined to want to do more.
The bottom line is, if it's going to cost me an opportunity cost of $100 to stay out one more hour, they had better make damn sure that I am going to get at least $100 of benefit from that hour. If attending a boasting session is going to have a $200 opportunity cost value, they had better make sure I get more than $200 of value from attending. Otherwise, I will not even think of going.