Leolaia
Post 11709
I hope that the preamble of your opinion as posted by the person reponsible for Watchtower Comments now realizes that your opinion far from being scholarly in nature is simply for "informal. lay-oriented discussion".
Your exegesis of the subject of the Parousia and the Generation is dishonest whereupon you claim without evidence that parousia means 'coming' and not presence. Further, you claim that the description of the parousia as an extended period of time comes ot of nowhere. It is you who have comprehension skills as the reason for this interpretation is clearly presented in four paragraphs under the heading An Extended Period of Time. This section is based upon two major exegetical considerations namely the parousia began in 1914 with the installation of Jesus Christ as King in heaven and the period syntelia as 'the conclusion of the system of things' corresponds or runs parallel with the parousia. Also it is stated as an accepted fact that parousia means 'presence'.
Next, In the immediate context the parousia was compared by Jesus himself to the Days of Noah and not to the Flood of Noah in Matthew 24:37-39 wherein parousia is mentioned twice. Clearly this period was not momentary but covered a long or extended period of time and it was described as a parousia. You are quite mistaken when you foolishly claim that "It is not this prior state that is compared to the parousia but the cataclysm that brings it to its consummation". The pericope clearly states otherwise, the Flood simply concluded or ended that Noachin Parousia.
Further, other Bible prophecies from Revelation such as the Four Horsemen or Cavaliers which agains begins with the now exalted and victorious Jesus Christ followed by succeeding prodigies or woes for the earth all of which have affected the world since 1914. We are and have seen all of these things since 1914 which looking back is indeed an extended period of time. These woes correspond with Sign asked by the disciples in Matthew 24:3 and such were described from the beginning of Jesus' answer which beginning of the parousia and the synteleia. Contrary to your view, commentators do indeed find paralleles between the Messianic woes of Matthew and these Four Horsemen. (Revelation 6-16, WBC, Vol.52B,1998, p.424)
Revelation 12describes the birth of God's kingdom which was followed by a 'period of time' in which the worls would suffer many woes and looking back to 1914 we see clear evidence that over that period of time manking has been afflicted with those many woes described by the Synoptic writers and the Apostle John. Psalms 2 and 110 describe that same installation of the Christ as King and the alluded events would also occupy a long period of time. In short, those paragraphs well prove that the parousia would be a period of time marked by many significant events attested by modern history to that epochal year of 1914.
Scholars publish their research in journals and invite criticsm for they realize that scholarship remains always a work in progress and so it is with Biblical Revelation and Interpretation. Scholars also know that there are many different interpretations so it is wise for readers and students of Scripture to read widely and not to be gullible. Your opinion is presented in a dogmatic way which promotes gullibility in the minds of its readers. It is as you correctly say, Your opinion.
scholar JW