Multiverse? Isn't that just another unobservable flying spaghetti monster like Dawkins is trying to sell?
Richard Dawkins Gets "Expelled" by Ben Stein!
by Perry 365 Replies latest watchtower scandals
-
serotonin_wraith
I'm suggesting possibilities. Things like that are a hypothesis. They all get put on the table and then research is carried out to try and answer the question. It's a very humble thing to do - admitting you're not sure of something. It means the search for the answer can continue. Saying 'my god did it' is only going to shut off the search, don't you think?
-
Perry
And that is different than saying my alien did it? How? The world made so much more sense when atheists were against intelligent design.
-
serotonin_wraith
I've answered how aliens are different to a god, and so did Richard Dawkins in the article above. He also addresses the claim that he now believes aliens designed us. You don't have to read it, but if you're refusing to could you please stop repeating what you're saying? One of the great things about forums is that you can get feedback to your questions. You'll have the chance to shut yourself off from opposite views when you go to church today, but here it's good to be open.
-
Perry
Seratonin, Please just answer one question.... alright? Why would a scientist discuss aliens in the first place? I don't know of any scientists that have proof of one. By contrast, millions of people will testify that God has shown Himself to them. Therefore, for them they have Ultimate Proof. I know this is true for me. I have proof that I possess a spirit and that God exists. For me, it is no longer a question but a reality. Since, this is the testimony of millions against the testimony of none, why would atheist scientists insist on presenting aliens as a source of life, even if only intermediary?
-
THE GLADIATOR
By contrast, millions of people will testify that God has shown Himself to them.
Tut! Tut!
'No man may see God and yet Live'
-
Perry
1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. - KJV
-
serotonin_wraith
Why would a scientist discuss aliens in the first place? I don't know of any scientists that have proof of one.
I'll quote from the article for you-
I sometimes hand an olive branch to these people by pretending to take their "space aliens" political ploy seriously. Unrealistic as the space alien theory is, it constitutes intelligent design's best shot.
When I have raised the science-fiction olive branch to try to argue against them, they have twisted it -- most recently in a movie scheduled to open this week -- in order to proclaim loudly, "Dawkins believes in intelligent design after all." Or "Dawkins believes in little green men in flying saucers." Or "Dawkins is a Raelian." It's called "lying for Jesus," and they are completely shameless.
Put simply: He is not saying aliens designed us.
By contrast, millions of people will testify that God has shown Himself to them
What this nearly always comes down to is a feeling, nothing more.
The millions of believers are split too. Millions feel certain Allah is with them, millions feel certain Jehovah's Witnesses are the one true religion, millions feel certain reincarnation is a reality. With all the contradictions in these beliefs, millions of these people (and perhaps all of them) are automatically wrong, because they can't all be right.
-
Perry
But Seratonin, I saw the interview. That is what he said. He said that Intelligent Design could/should be legitimately discussed in the context of aliens rather than God. Does that sound like science to you?
-
Perry
Seratonin, you know that all the millions of witnesses of God are deluded and the space alien preaching Dawkins is right? How could you believe such a thing much less know it?