Well i will try to make me more understand:
1/ This association has been taking place after 2001 and the brutal end of the UN-DPI/Watchtower association, so the Watchtower was at this time well aware of the moral implication of collaboration with one of the UN agency.
2/ The IAPSO (Inter-Agency Procurement Services Office) was part at this time of the UNDP ( United Nations Development Program), so all ONG who had access to the facilities of IAPSO were partners of the UNDP, so it is really a clear collaboration to the UN policy and programs. (see for example: http://www.investindk.com/visCase.asp?artikelID=8212&print=true). In the case of the UN-DPI/Watchtower association, the collaboration was only by disseminate positive information about UN, in this new case, it is not only word but acts, a clear participation at one of UN programs concerning development.
3/In the UN-DPI/Watchtower association, even if the Watchtower has lied concerning the access of the library (it was possible to have access to the library in a different manner without sustaining UN), it is difficult to see the benefit of the association with the DPI. The only possible benefit that Watchtower had, was a kind of respectability when they talked to government or in the OSCE conference (Hey, we are an NGO associated with the UN/DPI, look how respectable we are !). Here, the benefits are evident, the customers of IAPSO, in this case the Watchtower as an NGO, has perhaps buyed some procurement at a limited cost.(Vehicules, computers ?)
4/ If they have used the IAPSO facilities to buy some procurements. They have presented a clear project of development to the IAPSO to be validate as a IAPSO customer, even more they have perhaps accept to be an actor of one of a development program of UNDP. What kind of development project the Watchtower has in third world nation ?
I have write to the IAPSO to know what project the Watchtower has in collaboration with UNDP few weeks ago. I have no answer. If some of you have the time and the abilities in english to write to them, perhaps the IAPSO team will consider the matter ?
I have tried this e-mail, which is in the frontpage of their website: [email protected], perhaps it is not here to make inquiries.
Please help !!!!