"a man's enemies..."

by teejay 20 Replies latest jw friends

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Jesus could easily have taken care to make his meaning clear. As he left it, the whole thing does sound rather sinister. In fact what he said was,

    Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth.
    I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to
    turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a
    daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law -- a man's enemies
    will be the members of his own household.

    To borrow a Focusism (hopefully I'm remembering who to attribute this terseness too, it certainly couldn't come from anyone as sugary sweet as me), please re-read until understood.

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Hey teejay,jws always justify their evil deeds with scriptures from the bible.Now how evil is that?I never let hypocrates preach to me!...OUTLAW

  • bigboi
    bigboi

    Good topic and responses all around.

    I think a major point that is missed in interpreting this scripture is that Jesus was talking about the reactions of those who were NOT his followers. His loyal followers were the ones who would be on the recieving end of this particularly trying sort of persecution.

    ONE....

    bigboi

  • lauralisa
    lauralisa

    wow bigboi...

    You nailed that one....

    teejay.... now I get it!

    The only point I was making is that by viewing this single passage the way they do, JWs are able to have a clear(er) conscience when turning their backs on former family members and life-long friends. The painful feelings daughters and sons may have when shunning their exJW parents (or vice versa... and I DO believe they feel pain) is considerably lessened for the loyal JW since they believe Jesus' words recorded in Matthew are prophetically true in their case.
    Too bad they won't come right out and say "The ____ made me do it"

    lauralisa

  • ISP
    ISP

    I wouldn't dwell too much on it anyway. The stuff Jesus said/was supposed to have said..is very much a matter of fiction. The gospels were put together in the second century..and mention events/happenings unknown to the early writers. The early writers do not mention JC's parables, illustrations and miracles! I wonder why?

    ISP

  • teejay
    teejay

    ... when I asked her why jesus didn't want the whole family to be saved she went onto some mumbo jumbo about not being worthy, and their hearts are hardened. And I had to jump off the merry go round because I don't want to ride anymore.

    Wendy,

    More than anything else you said, this jumps out.

    'Reasoning' with a JW is never going to get you very far unless you wise up and agree with them. I know. If I think about it too long, I start to get a little sad -- I wasted a lot of my life defending JW foolishness myself.

    The average JW, like the average person in general, is not much of a thinker really, and they tend to simply parrot what's been shoved down their throats by 'God's mouthpiece' (see ANYTHING that JR Brown says publically).

    E-man's analysis of what Jesus actually meant is clear as day (and the JW's own bible footnotes to the passage in Micah that Jesus was quoting), but few of them are willing to do the research... or care. Those that are are understandably unwilling to openly disagree with the official policy and pay the price that goes along with being labeled an independent thinker.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lauralisa,

    You make good points about the religious leaders of Jesus' day, particularly their interest in having full control over their members. As you said, their interpretations of the existing scriptures became LAW and those bold enough to disagree paid a heavy price. (who does that remind us of!?) The same exclusivity of thought and scriptural exegesis has been true ever since. History books are full of examples of people whose minds and free will were essentially raped by religions and gov'ts, if the dissidents weren't murdered outright. As you said, such mental and spiritual oppression still exists in full force today, in contexts other than religious.

    Isn't Jesus trying to speak to THIS issue in your reference in Matthew 10:34? Wasn't he trying to blast through the stronghold that those mind-killers had on people? He was straightforward about the "costs" it would take to break out of that cult mentality. He inferred that it would probably cost everything a person had, perhaps their very life.

    It's hard for me to say exactly what the Son of Man EVER had in mind. I tend to agree with Six who said that Jesus could have made himself clearer, but in being vague (here and other places) he was only acting like his father. I don't have a concrete opinion on who Jesus was or wasn't.

    My quoting him here was only to show one of the primary reasons that JWs have at hand to justify their inhumane, illogical, unloving treatment of loved ones who simply come to have different ideas and see things differently. Often, these shunned ones have been known and loved and associated with for decades and now, all of a sudden, the loyal JW won't even say a terse 'hello' in public or wave from across the street. I know -- I've been the waver and the wavee.

    While you may be right -- that Jesus didn't force his viewpoints on any -- if he was anywhere near as clever as he's purported to have been he should have clearly understood the radical changes his viewpoints were going to bring into the lives of his followers. He could have done much more to prepare them for what was to befall them instead of simply saying that they would find enemies in their own household, but then maybe they should have understood that.

    You mentioned the article in the Insight book on "shunning." Years ago, I gave a Number Five student talk on that article (it was the Aid book at the time). I don't remember all of the points it discussed, but I do recall that shunning back then could carry very serious repercussions. In it's strongest sense, people's financial lives were ruined. Other than leaving the country, I don't see how they could survive physically, not to mention their mental and emotional well-being. Maybe Jesus knew what he was setting them up for, after all.

    I can't say that there was a particular reason why I thought of that quote of "the Master," other than that it's played a part in how I treated others and how they treated me when I was 'on the ship' (as my buds and I used to call df'ing). It's not a reason to totally excuse the JW's treatment of their df'd family, but it is a very good reason.

    My eldest sister (and favorite sibling) was df'd in 1971 when I was thirteen and she was 19. This scripture often came to mind when I wavered in my support of the society's edict relative to how to treat df'd family members. I love her to pieces, I look up to her as I always did, but our relationship was irreparably damaged years ago when I was unable to think for myself, and for that the blame lies with me. It's one of my life's major, major regrets.

    The society's teachings no longer affect any aspect of my life, but that may change somewhat as my two-year-old's association with the congregation increases (her JW mom takes her). There are no guarantees, of course, but the plan is for me to return to the mtgs when she begins to understand what she hears, so that I can help her see the whole story.

    The plan is for her to never come close to considering being a JW. Like I said... no guarantees, and kids do silly things sometimes. Still, I will be there for her whatever she decides to do with her life, but I will definitely nudge her away from that twisted religion. Wish I'd-a had that. No life is perfect, I guess.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Six,

    Jesus could easily have taken care to make his meaning clear. As he left it, the whole thing does sound rather sinister...

    I agree totally. Taken just the way he said it, it should have been clear that those who embraced his teachings were in for a few little changes in their family lives.

    If he was all-wise like they say, he should've done a better job preparing them for it, or else amending what he said, cause the disruptions between loving family members aren't a necessity to Christianity. I mean, you can be a Christian (or not) and still be friends with, hang out with, associate with and love people whose beliefs differ from yours. I do it all the time. What I personally believe has no bearing on who I care about.

    But then, I ain't Jesus.

    peace, y'all

  • bigboi
    bigboi

    I guess it really all depends on your mindset.

    I don't see anything sinister in Jesus telling his followers what to expect as far as possible consequences for following him. If you read that chapter in Matthew there are a lot of possible circumstances addressed. Jesus quite simply tells it how it is or possibly will be. He was in fact preparing the twelve for what they were about to experience for the first verse in chapter 11 says that he set out to go preach in their cities after giving them these instructions.

    i think this was merely one of Jesus' use of hyperbole to show that following him could cause severe disrupion to even the most intimate relationships.

    ONE....

    bigboi

  • Rex B13
    Rex B13

    Sorry TJ, you are dead wrong.
    Jesus is telling His disciples that they themselves will be subject to strained family relations, persecution and even martyrdom. He is laying it on the line and they are told that they must be willing to endure such things.
    Following God in a fallen world is never easy. He goes on to show that the 'elect' must love God, even giving up loved ones if THEY will not accept the personal decision of the believer. Indeed, the price for eternal life is to give over all things (physical, material, spiritual) that keep us from serving our Lord fully. There is no reference to shunning. Can the passage be twisted? Of course!
    The context of this passage shows clearly that there is no 'cheap grace', as some critics say of the Biblical teaching that, salvation is by grace through faith alone and not works. You receive salvation because you are of the elect and then your works are a proof of your saving grace.
    You really need to go beyond single scripture interpretation and look at the whole context. I know that is not easy, coming from where we come from.
    Rex

  • teejay
    teejay

    Rex,

    Sorry TJ, you are dead wrong. Jesus is telling His disciples that they themselves will be subject to strained family relations, persecution and even martyrdom. He is laying it on the line and they are told that they must be willing to endure such things.

    No, Rex, I think I'm right... no... I KNOW I'm right.

    I wasn't trying to explain what Jesus meant by what he said in Matthew. As I already mentioned here at least twice, Englishman did that. What Jesus meant was never my point. Still isn't. What I meant was this:

    There are many JWs out there who have family members or longtime friends who are presently disfellowshipped. Fact Number One. Many of this number of loyal JWs obediently follow the governing body's directives in dealing with df'd people -- they don't speak, talk to, or otherwise associate with the df'd people, no matter how close they once were. That's Fact Number 2.

    My original point is simply this:

    Loyal dubs use what Jesus said to justify the way they act toward their former friends and family. Period. Most (if not all) of them are clueless to what you and E-man said as to Jesus' REAL meaning. They don't know that in Matthew, Jesus was not giving instructions on how to treat non-believing loved ones. Today's loyal JWs are simply allowing their behavior to be shaped by the Society's explanation of what Jesus said, not meant.

    Believe me... I KNOW. I did it myself, and when I was df'd, I completely understood why people (family and longtime friends included) treated me the way they did. What Jesus said played a very role in it.

    You make very good and valid points in your note (and I can't/don't disagree with ANY of them), but these have no relevance or bearing on the attitudes or actions the average JW employs in their treatment of df'd people.

    What Jesus said does.

    tj

  • DannyBear
    DannyBear

    tj,

    ***But then, I ain't Jesus.***

    Yeah, but you sound more like Jesus than Jesus.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit