truthseeker said: Do you think eventually that scientists will find "sin"? TS, It doesn't take a rocket scientist to find sin. All it takes is a good marketer with an advertising campaign. leviticus 7:7 7 " 'The same law applies to both the sin offering and the guilt offering: They belong to the priest who makes atonement with them. hosea 4:9 8 “When the people bring their sin offerings, the priests get fed.
So the priests are glad when the people sin! Then, it was animals. Today it is money. The more they can make you feel guilty, the more $$$ you feel obliged to give. It gives a "sense of absolution." I do not believe that all this crap about sin and blood sacrifice is from the true Creator. I believe Jesus came to expose the truth about a lot of those things. He was murdered for it and the truth of it is still hushed up today. In the Book of Enoch, we are told that when the Watcher angels fell with satan and came to earth they "began to hurt the animals". The blood of the sacrifice had to be carried into the temple, into the holy of holies. After the blood was drained and sprinkled on the altar, then the priests were allowed to cook and eat the meat. Do these demon angels require human blood to survive? What is this blood sacrifice about? It started long before Jesus ever entered the picture. So don't tell me it represents that! Jesus said "I come that you might have life more abundantly" and that was the purpose and focus of his teachings. Journey-on said: "... original sin involved Eve then Adam going outside their kind and copulating with the race of humanoids that was living in their midst ..." ...could those humanoids be "angels"? Genesis 5:1 "This is the book of the generations of Adam". Funny, it starts with Seth. There is no mention of Cain. Perhaps Cain was not of Adam. Luke 3:38 also supports this with no mention of Cain in Adam's geneology. Cain......baal...........Cannibal???
Looking at sin under the microscope
by truthseeker 10 Replies latest jw friends
-
winnower