sweetstuff:
Now we both know that is never going to happen, its as likely as living forever on a paradise earth.
Why couldn't it happen? Even if it may seem unattainable, that does not stop it from being a better system than the one we have now.
So my point was simply this....if her child benefits, good.
And my point was if that's at the expense of another child, bad.
And of course I know there are more than two alternatives, it was an example, I'm not a moron FD. (Waiting for you to jump on that one.)
Of course not. However, you did say that it was better to spend the money this way than in another way, and I don't necessarily disagree. But it's still better not to be spending other people's money in this way at all.
I find it personally grating to hear people bitching in general about this kind of thing, when most of us in developed countries are spoiled friggin rotten and have no bloodly clue what it really means to work your ass off or struggle. At least we have houses, clean water, hospitals. I'd rather worry about much more important things that how someone got a deal "undeservedly" on tax dollars.
Well, sure. We should all be thankful that our lives are so great that we have the free time, the education and the technology to have this debate and I'm sure we all are. But that doesn't stop us wanting to make things even better.
Yeah, I suppose you could view it that way, or you could view it that her ancestors certainly didn't get any discounts and were royally screwed by the european settlers . Or does it not count because its the past? Shit on people who aren't anglo-saxon for centuries and then when the tables turn around a bit, cry how racist it is. Equality is a relatively new concept and a very convienent one to the dwindling anglo-saxon gene pool.
Isn't that the very definition of racism? Rewarding or punishing someone because of their (probable) ancestry. There has to be a statute of limitations on past atrocities or institutionalised racism will simply be perpetuated.