This refers to the on-going Michael the Archangel is Jesus argument...
My wife gives Daniel 10:13, 21 and 12:1 as proof that Michael is the post-ressurected Jesus. Are those versus even referring to Michael the Archangel or some other Michael? If so, where is the proof that it refers to him as Jesus?
Also in the NWT, how is Luke 2:21 translated? Here's the KJV;
21 And when eight days were completed for the circumcision of the Child, [e] His name was called JESUS, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.
That verse seems to say it all for me, but you know how JW's are, "It may say that but..."
Help me if you can I'm feelin' down...
kzjw