DA Letter Based on the "Blood Issue"

by watson 31 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • LDH
    LDH
    This position also has nothing to do with my own son being disfellowshipped, though some I am sure will choose to believe otherwise. I will however add this information about this personal ordeal that brings to light another problem; After receiving a very emotional phone call from my disfellowshipped son thousands of miles away in September 2004, I was told by one of our elders that it was, "wrong for me to have accepted that phone call". Instead he said I should have told him to "locate the elders in his territory" and that "we need to tighten up things around here in our congregation". This was the most insensitive counsel that I have ever heard in my years in the truth. His mother had recently committed suicide just a couple of years before, he had just turned 18, was own his own for the first time in his life, disfellowshipped, was 5000 miles from home and felt extremely lonely, sad and despondent. Sure, I could have "turned down" that call all right. Who in his right frame of mind though would have done such a thing to their own son or daughter, in such a time of need? Then, nine months later, after discussing it with the rest of my family, we agreed to allow him to return to living in our house, from Maui. (This decision was due to his very deep depression, suicidal tendencies, a drug dependency problem, and having the ACL torn out in his knee...all at the same time). We agreed to allow him back home to get the help needed to get back on his feet, under very strict circumstances I might add (as the watchtower allows) which included his going to meetings, bringing no leaven into the home, turning his life back around by serving Jehovah, (which he did for six months by the way). I was then told by this same elder that my decision to allow him home was "cutting the hand of Jehovah short, and another big mistake", and because of this erroneous decision on my part, I as his father "might be the one destroyed at Armageddon". This same elder then took me off the watchtower reader's list for the first time in my eight years living on this island. (I had no problem with this, but felt I should at least be told about it) When I inquired as to whether it was just a coincidence or by design that I was missing from that list, he told me that it was by "choice" and that there would be "more where that came from". While this "list" of unreasonable responses about my helping my own son after his being disfellowshipped may seem completely unfair and far less than loving, the brother himself truly believed what he was doing was the correct thing. I will also add that there was very little personal resentment on either of our parts. He sincerely believed he was just doing what the society wanted. One of the things I cannot understand then, is how we as Jehovah's Witnesses can spend enormous amounts of time assisting other people in our ministry -people that are often depressed, fighting addictions, language issues, living at times as we know very ungodly lives-, to do better and we ultimately give these ones the help and assistance needed so they can serve God in an acceptable manner. However,if one of our very OWN people or family members has been disfellowshipped, and happens to fall into a similar dangerous pattern (one that often begs for loving assistance now more than ever) we have minimal provisions at all to help these ones of our own to get back onto their feet. They in fact must be "cut off" and completely shunned by all at a time when many will actually need help the most.
    The example of my son above illustrates this well. For someone to lose their mother at such a young age (15) via a gun in her mouth, and then spiral into a course of rebellion is not that uncommon. But to completely have to cut that person off, without any assistance whatsoever from the congregation, when help is MOST needed at this time, is contrary to what the scriptures teach us about Jehovah. He continued to ask the Israelites to come back to him over and over. Even assisting these former rebels to gain his favor once again. Now, because this same individual (my son) now moves out of my home, I too, as his father, am expected to cut off all ties and association with him. Even keeping business dealings to a minimum. There are downtimes in our lives when we need help and support and love, rather than just blindly cutting these ones off indefinitely. Where is the balance, the love and the help in such a policy as this today?

    Absolutely true, and chilling.

    What parent would turn their back on their child. Didn't Jesus say a shepherd would GO LOOKING for one of his lost sheep? They are full of shit.

  • Witness 007
    Witness 007

    The same reason my faith was killed. The blood issue does not make any sense on any level, it's a joke and makes Jehovah s Witnesses look like fools.

  • IHaveADream
    IHaveADream

    Well, we all know what has been said about absolute power. And this is one corrupt organization. It must really make these little men feel very superior to make and change rules at their whim. They give not one iota as to the consequences of the rank and file who dutifully try to jump through their hoops in order to remain within the WT sacred circle.

    I personally know a couple who lost their 5 year-old son because of the prohibition of blood transfusions. They are still active JWs, but they are totally messed up mentally. And who wouldn't be? It just tears my heart out to think of what they went through all because of this organization and their twisted dogma.

  • Mickey mouse
    Mickey mouse

    That is a really excellent piece of work.

  • carla
    carla

    marking

  • treadnh2o
    treadnh2o

    Wow! summed up this website in one letter.

    Very well written.


    Thanks for the post.

  • purplesofa
    purplesofa

    Thanks for posting. btw, it prints out to 15 pages.

    Very sobering letter. well written

    I can't wait to give it to a friend of mine to read.

    I am so sorry for all the people who have died from refusing blood.

    This illustration was great.

    To encourage other people we meet in the ministry to "examine their religion", yet at the same time to forbid us to do the same is nothing short of hypocritical. We are told that we can examine our faith, though this must be done "In-house". In other words, only through the society's publications can we examine our religion. Any other sources that are critical are considered apostate and dangerous. I consider this position by the organization to be very similar to my wanting to buy a new Nikon camera for example. Imagine if Nikon told me that I could ONLY use their-own reference material to gain information? Consumer Reports, Popular Photography or any other "Non-Partisan" publication would be completely off limits. And, if I did go to these "outside" sources, and shared any critical opinions/reviews with others, I would no longer be allowed to even buy their camera, plus other people who like Nikon cameras would have to now shun me altogether. How reasonable is this? This is exactly what the society is doing. Those that know me will tell you that whenever I make any type of serious purchase, I do my homework and extensive research. We just recently purchased a high-end scanner; I spent perhaps two months or more comparing scanners, reading reviews, learning as much as I possibly could about this piece of equipment before purchasing. If it is reasonable then to carefully "examine" the purchase of a piece of equipment, and it is reasonable to ask others in our ministry to carefully "examine" their own religion, why is it unreasonable then to carefully "examine" our own religion and means of worshiping God? And, if one does examine his faith and does find problems and then expresses these concerns about what he has learned, how can the "complete removal" of that person be considered anything but completely unfair?

    purps

  • StAnn
    StAnn

    I've said it before, Dubs would have made great Nazis. They are conditioned to do what they are told, right or wrong, and to quelch any doubts.

    This is an excellent article. I've sent it on to others I believe would benefit from it.

    StAnn

  • mtsgrad
    mtsgrad

    Lovely letter. Wish O couild write like that.

    mtsgrad

  • steve2
    steve2

    The letter is a soundly composed, heartfelt plea to the organization to re-appraise its illogical and cruel objections to blood transfusions. Although predominantly about the blood issue, other issues are also presented.

    My one reservation is that, because several well-detailed issues have also been presented in the same letter, it will be "easier" for the organization to slide over the information about blood transfusions and conclude that this brother was on the way out of the organization anyway - given the range of doctrines and practices that he questioned. This is not to detract from his excellent letter which will be a tonic for many people who are questioning the religion.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit